All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
To: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] sch_htb: Avoid grafting on htb_destroy_class_offload when destroying htb
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:27:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7/8rXHmchlG2qqE@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111203732.51363-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:37:33PM -0800, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> When destroying the htb, the caller may already have grafted a new qdisc
> that is not part of the htb structure being destroyed.
> htb_destroy_class_offload should not peek at the qdisc of the netdev queue.
> Peek at old qdisc and graft only when deleting a leaf class in the htb,
> rather than when deleting the htb itself.
> 
> This fix resolves two use cases.
> 
>   1. Using tc to destroy the htb.
>   2. Using tc to replace the htb with another qdisc (which also leads to
>      the htb being destroyed).

Please elaborate in the commit message what exactly was broken in these
cases, i.e. premature dev_activate in both cases, and also accidental
overwriting of the qdisc in case 2.

> 
> Fixes: d03b195b5aa0 ("sch_htb: Hierarchical QoS hardware offload")
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/sched/sch_htb.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
> index 2238edece1a4..360ce8616fd2 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
> @@ -1557,14 +1557,13 @@ static int htb_destroy_class_offload(struct Qdisc *sch, struct htb_class *cl,
>  
>  	WARN_ON(!q);
>  	dev_queue = htb_offload_get_queue(cl);
> -	old = htb_graft_helper(dev_queue, NULL);
> -	if (destroying)
> -		/* Before HTB is destroyed, the kernel grafts noop_qdisc to
> -		 * all queues.
> +	if (!destroying) {
> +		old = htb_graft_helper(dev_queue, NULL);
> +		/* Last qdisc grafted should be the same as cl->leaf.q when
> +		 * calling htb_destroy

Did you mean "when calling htb_delete"?

Worth also commenting that on destroying, graft is done by qdisc_graft,
and the latter also qdisc_puts the old one. Just to explain why we skip
steps on destroying.

>  		 */
> -		WARN_ON(!(old->flags & TCQ_F_BUILTIN));
> -	else
>  		WARN_ON(old != q);
> +	}
>  
>  	if (cl->parent) {
>  		_bstats_update(&cl->parent->bstats_bias,
> @@ -1581,10 +1580,14 @@ static int htb_destroy_class_offload(struct Qdisc *sch, struct htb_class *cl,
>  	};
>  	err = htb_offload(qdisc_dev(sch), &offload_opt);
>  
> -	if (!err || destroying)
> -		qdisc_put(old);
> -	else
> -		htb_graft_helper(dev_queue, old);
> +	/* htb_offload related errors when destroying cannot be handled */
> +	WARN_ON(err && destroying);

Not sure whether we want to WARN on this error...

On destroying, we call htb_offload with TC_HTB_LEAF_DEL_LAST_FORCE,
which makes the mlx5e driver proceed with deleting the node even if it
failed to create a replacement node. Normally it cancels the deletion to
keep the integrity of hardware structures, but on htb_destroy it doesn't
matter, because everything is going to be torn down anyway. An error is
still returned by the driver, but it's safe to ignore it, not worth a
WARN at all.

Another error flow, when the firmware command to delete a node fails for
some reason, doesn't even lead to returning an error, because the worst
that happens is a leak of hardware resources, and we can't do anything
meaningful about it at that stage.

So, I don't think this WARN_ON is helpful, unless you also want to
change the way mlx5e returns errors.

> +	if (!destroying) {
> +		if (!err)
> +			qdisc_put(old);
> +		else
> +			htb_graft_helper(dev_queue, old);
> +	}

Looks good. I also suggest removing NULL-initialization of old to make
sure one will get a compiler warning about an uninitialized variable if
one changes the code in the future and accidentally uses old in the
destroying flow.

>  
>  	if (last_child)
>  		return err;
> -- 
> 2.36.2
> 
> Previous related discussions
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230110202003.25452-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230104174744.22280-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iJSsFPBp5dYm3y6Jbbpuwbb9P+X3gmqk6zow0VWgx1Q-A@mail.gmail.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-12 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11 20:37 [PATCH net v2] sch_htb: Avoid grafting on htb_destroy_class_offload when destroying htb Rahul Rameshbabu
2023-01-12 12:27 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy [this message]
2023-01-12 22:10   ` Rahul Rameshbabu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7/8rXHmchlG2qqE@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=maxtram95@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.