All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Farah Kassabri <fkassabri@habana.ai>
Cc: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] habanalabs: Timestamps buffers registration
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:54:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y701zVEvafJdWgOL@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR02MB52357E1350CD36360D2E91F8ADFE9@AM0PR02MB5235.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 03:07:33PM +0000, Farah Kassabri wrote:
> >     2171 {
> >     2172         struct hl_ts_buff *ts_buff = NULL;
> >     2173         u32 size, num_elements;
> >     2174         void *p;
> >     2175
> >     2176         num_elements = *(u32 *)args;
> > 
> > This business of passing void pointers and pretending that
> > hl_cb_mmap_mem_alloc() and hl_ts_alloc_buf() are the same function is a
> > nightmare.
> > 
> > Create two ->alloc functions.  Split hl_mmap_mem_buf_alloc() into one
> > function that allocates idr stuff.  Create a function to free/remove the idr
> > stuff.  Create two new helper function that call the idr function and then the
> > appropriate alloc() function.
> > 
> > It will be much cleaner than using a void pointer.
> 
> I'm not sure I understood your intention.
> What void pointers are you referring to ? the args in this line rc = buf->behavior->alloc(buf, gfp, args); ?
> If yes what's so bad about it, it much simpler to have one common function  and call specific implementation through pointers.
> BTW same goes to the map function also, not just the alloc (each behavior has alloc and map method)
> 

Yeah, you're right.  I didn't look at this carefully.  I'm sorry.

> > 
> >     2177
> > --> 2178         ts_buff = kzalloc(sizeof(*ts_buff), GFP_KERNEL);
> >                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^ Smatch is correct that it should be
> > used here.
> 
> Sure will be fixed.
> 
> > 
> >     2179         if (!ts_buff)
> >     2180                 return -ENOMEM;
> >     2181
> >     2182         /* Allocate the user buffer */
> >     2183         size = num_elements * sizeof(u64);
> > 
> > Can this have an integer overflow on 32bit systems?
> 
> I'll define "size" as size_t instead of u32.
> 

This can't actually overflow because it's checked in the caller.

Perhaps the careful way to write this is to change size to size_t as you
suggest which fixes the issue for 64bit systems and use size_mul() so it
doesn't overflow on 32bit systems either.

	size = size_mul(num_elements, sizeof(u64));

But it doesn't really matter either way because num_elements is capped
in the caller.

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-10  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-06  8:32 [bug report] habanalabs: Timestamps buffers registration Dan Carpenter
2023-01-09 15:07 ` Farah Kassabri
2023-01-10  9:54   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y701zVEvafJdWgOL@kadam \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=fkassabri@habana.ai \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.