From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
yisen.zhuang@huawei.com, salil.mehta@huawei.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
tariqt@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org,
idosch@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com, mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr,
jacob.e.keller@intel.com, gal@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 01/11] devlink: remove devlink features
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:12:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y70PyuHXJZ3gD8dG@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109165500.3bebda0a@kernel.org>
Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:55:00AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 19:31:10 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Note that mlx5 used this to enable devlink reload conditionally only
>> when device didn't act as multi port slave. Move the multi port check
>> into mlx5_devlink_reload_down() callback alongside with the other
>> checks preventing the device from reload in certain states.
>
>Right, but this is not 100% equivalent because we generate the
>notifications _before_ we try to reload_down:
>
> devlink_ns_change_notify(devlink, dest_net, curr_net, false);
> err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, limit, extack);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
>IDK why, I haven't investigated.
Right, but that is done even in other cases where down can't be done. I
I think there's a bug here, down DEL notification is sent before calling
down which can potentially fail. I think the notification call should be
moved after reload_down() call. Then the bahaviour would stay the same
for the features case and will get fixed for the reload_down() reject
cases. What do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-10 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 18:31 [patch net-next v3 00/11] devlink: features, linecard and reporters locking cleanup Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 01/11] devlink: remove devlink features Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 0:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-10 7:12 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-10 20:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 7:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-11 8:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 12:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 02/11] devlink: remove linecards lock Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 03/11] devlink: remove linecard reference counting Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 8:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 04/11] devlink: protect health reporter operation with instance lock Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 8:37 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 05/11] devlink: remove reporters_lock Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 06/11] devlink: remove devl_port_health_reporter_destroy() Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 07/11] devlink: remove reporter reference counting Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 08/11] devlink: convert linecards dump to devlink_nl_instance_iter_dump() Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 09/11] devlink: convert reporters " Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 10/11] devlink: remove devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get() helper Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 18:31 ` [patch net-next v3 11/11] devlink: add instance lock assertion in devl_is_registered() Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 1:13 ` [patch net-next v3 00/11] devlink: features, linecard and reporters locking cleanup Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-10 8:40 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-01-11 7:14 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y70PyuHXJZ3gD8dG@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.