From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF404256E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id h16so14928188wrz.12 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 05:00:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GciVknUp2+tJrdQZ3wGdbeoH9KpDzgfg+dAYwK6p4NQ=; b=hFs0FLeBgkXlb8v7+s7DzG2Gy3uf0Cp4O4WExnbWOF++Vn1pUqBIHMU2Ri+G0wss6p 4sCe4pfh0UvfFFDYxHWP8738wJvhNliIxM14ZJm2hIdA9i1eDBCqg1qBjDSu7EdlASED v9/Xh8XRRAXVDsTmOACbb8iq0NDDhK9XJsyJz2pT5aipt+MGYVnSdi790tR39lG5lS2T VXS6gBa8tsPuXPv4aejCiub4BRberdhUIMkG39SOxHskx6UxJ4b7D1Pa8i4shxnxqRP8 WpyFe9s2atWwRrgkL8rGoH/6SgexZQBhmgoau1ha3tjXqtp2nwPWeMQG0F7in8nXiE3N DxZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GciVknUp2+tJrdQZ3wGdbeoH9KpDzgfg+dAYwK6p4NQ=; b=hsef16BFPWs2RKZfyXDhgjsvT71Fw+aI5w/i5MFzoxw1DlZbr3TARNkfMPZrXCuH1O wYHAAz/EVOwZ5bRyVxbvrXZwtGS+lB7HjYTvZnsXobItLyOJodsURR806yUcaG6K47Cl svILfK0OU4tvQjLmKTRR3UdiZQrGxGIJX7Vms5HDgykpC45mfx/dndR9C2e/mbxWHcd0 CU0ualOd18XbeXNL3viO/Oz4vRpHGgHW/nKj44jrBI5x3wReOc6CrtB/ZiAheKyPVXv6 656wtHekGrno+jsr50aRKWiV/0fi/1BGFRtC+9A71fN18qoz2dAzsJyBSAAmSVsJKyhI pPxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqYtu8ExU9WlVDPffwdqw01JHfG5WXwdI6cZP+/Sb/41j7A5sq8 bcfu5b5/ZbigVEFpHRC7u0E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsORqDA5bKI9k1rg0ymSgo23lzq1B638aQ0UaQn2i8MWHUvB5+6xgf5+Q2xQ8/2JEEHid+hBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5c12:0:b0:242:800:9a7f with SMTP id cc18-20020a5d5c12000000b0024208009a7fmr48838506wrb.65.1673442042777; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 05:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c13-20020adffb0d000000b00241fde8fe04sm13629177wrr.7.2023.01.11.05.00.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 05:00:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:00:40 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/148] 6.0.19-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230110180017.145591678@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230110180017.145591678@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:01:44PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.19 release. > There are 148 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > NOTE, this will probably be the LAST 6.0.y release. If there is > anything preventing you from moving to 6.1.y right now, please let me > know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:59:42 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221127): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. Known issue - VNC server fails to start. [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2608 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2611 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip