From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7VL6P0hfCEvBFzV@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104041636.226398-3-kuba@kernel.org>
Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 05:16:24AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>Move core code into a separate file. It's spread around the main
>file which makes refactoring and figuring out how devlink works
>harder.
>
>Move the xarray, all the most core devlink instance code out like
>locking, ref counting, alloc, register, etc. Leave port stuff in
>basic.c, if we want to move port code it'd probably be to its own file.
leftover.c
>
>Rename devlink_netdevice_event() to make it clear that it only touches
>ports (that's the only change which isn't a pure code move).
Did you do any other changes on the move? I believe that for patches
like this that move a lot of code it is beneficial to move the code "as
is". The changes could be done in a separate patches, for the ease of
review purposes. Could you please?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 4:16 [PATCH net-next 00/14] devlink: code split and structured instance walk Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 9:50 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-01-05 2:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 23:55 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] devlink: split out netlink code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05 9:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 8:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] netlink: add macro for checking dump ctx size Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 9:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] devlink: use an explicit structure for dump context Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] devlink: remove start variables from dumps Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] devlink: health: combine loops in dump Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (simple) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 14:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 3:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (nested) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (function) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] devlink: uniformly take the devlink instance lock in the dump loop Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] devlink: add by-instance dump infra Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 16:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 3:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05 9:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 8:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 19:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-10 14:31 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 0:13 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 11:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] devlink: convert remaining dumps to the by-instance scheme Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7VL6P0hfCEvBFzV@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.