From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 18:27:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7W3BR4WmaapBQMT@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4b96b112d5415d08a81d30657feec2c8c3000f7c.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:24:33PM +0100, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 10:23 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Janis,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > s390-linux-ld: arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.o: in function `__cmpxchg_user_key':
> > > > arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h:410: undefined reference to `__ashlti3'
> > > > s390-linux-ld: arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h:411: undefined reference to `__ashlti3'
> > s390-linux-ld: arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h:458: undefined reference to `__ashlti3'
> > s390-linux-ld: arch/s390/include/asm/uaccess.h:459: undefined reference to `__ashlti3'
> > 51098f0eb22e2f Janis Schoetterl-Glausch 2022-11-16 @410 _old = (old & 0xff) << shift;
> > 51098f0eb22e2f Janis Schoetterl-Glausch 2022-11-16 @411 _new = (new & 0xff) << shift;
>
> Not sure what it is in this config that causes gcc to emit this
> symbol instead of a shift instruction, but casting old/new to 32 bit
> fixes the error.
Right.. now we have the same fun with 128 bit arithmetics that we had
with 64 bit arithmetics on 32 bit. I really missed that :)
Fixed the way you proposed it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=cmpxchg_user_key&id=b33d59fb37ddcb6ee65d4fa23cc3d58793d13c5b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 16:53 [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] " Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-14 2:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-19 21:24 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-01-04 17:27 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2022-12-14 9:19 ` Thomas Huth
2022-12-14 13:12 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] Documentation: KVM: s390: Describe KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CMPXCHG Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 17:32 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-12-13 16:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Pass mop_desc via pointer Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Replace macros by functions Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-14 9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2022-12-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-19 16:13 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add cmpxchg tests Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Add bad address test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix typo Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-12-13 16:54 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Fix wrong address being used in test Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7W3BR4WmaapBQMT@osiris \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.