All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
Cc: "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>,
	Long Xin <lxin@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Porfiri <claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: simplify sctp state machine
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 01:50:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7dwTU9Ky6RN1u7L@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DBBP189MB14337144265DA856B8321D1695FA9@DBBP189MB1433.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:11:44PM +0000, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2023 12:54
> > To: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
> > Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org; Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>;
> > Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>; Long Xin
> > <lxin@redhat.com>; Claudio Porfiri <claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com>
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: simplify sctp state machine
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 11:41:13AM +0000, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2023 16:02
> > > > To: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
> > > > Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org; Florian Westphal
> > > > <fw@strlen.de>; Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>; Long
> > > > Xin <lxin@redhat.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: simplify sctp state
> > > > machine
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> > > > > All the paths in an SCTP connection are kept alive either by
> > > > > actual DATA/SACK running through the connection or by HEARTBEAT.
> > > > > This patch proposes a simple state machine with only two states
> > > > > OPEN_WAIT and ESTABLISHED (similar to UDP). The reason for this
> > > > > change is a full stateful approach to SCTP is difficult when the
> > > > > association is multihomed since the endpoints could use different
> > > > > paths in the network during the lifetime of an association.
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean the router/firewall might not see all packets for
> > > > association is multihomed?
> > > >
> > > > Could you please provide an example?
> > >
> > > Let's say the primary and alternate/secondary paths between the SCTP
> > > endpoints traverse different middle boxes. If an SCTP endpoint detects
> > > network failure on the primary path, it will switch to using the
> > > secondary path and all subsequent packets will not be seen by the
> > > middlebox on the primary path, including SHUTDOWN sequences if they
> > > happen at that time.
> > 
> > OK, then on the primary middle box the SCTP flow will just timeout?
> > (because no more packets are seen).
> 
> Yes, they will timeout unless the primary path comes up before the
> SHUTDOWN sequence. And the default timeout for an ESTABLISHED SCTP
> connection is 5 days, which is a "long" time to clean-up this entry.

Does the middle box have a chance to see any packet that provides a
hint to shorten this timeout? no HEARTBEAT packets are seen in this
case on the former primary path?

What I am missing are a more detailed list of issues with the existing
approach. Your patch description says "SCTP tracking with multihoming
is difficult", probably a list of scenarios would help to understand
the motivation to simplify the state machine.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-06  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04 11:31 [RFC PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: simplify sctp state machine Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-04 12:41 ` Florian Westphal
2023-01-05 11:25   ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-04 15:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-05 11:41   ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-05 11:53     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-05 12:11       ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-06  0:50         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-01-11  9:36           ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-11 13:53             ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2023-01-12 11:38               ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-12 11:50             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-01-13  9:04               ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-16  9:37                 ` Sriram Yagnaraman
2023-01-05  9:21 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-05 10:21 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7dwTU9Ky6RN1u7L@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=lxin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mleitner@redhat.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.