From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538EFC5479D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232040AbjAIOJq (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:09:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233436AbjAIOJQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2023 09:09:16 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0636265A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 06:09:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1673273355; x=1704809355; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+kiBkmIhTRve6JyhcW4q0ULEglyxuibupsCKqdSdkzw=; b=O5u7u6XV5h9wDEu2RZP/WEriJfDAlrBawP7r3Okau4Ho7AxubPntjIrc mKkUTSRzUgpQRYKf0tHpl9nZhjyT2uVi0INgWZcZVNSiDSz+Q+vtMLzdR EGd8JsBcyw2nK5Xc0p1w7TcYxQEZkAutqY/AKQD0Q9r30FaRFa2DNIHJe P3ABpoYR1DQVEhOI02kDCXE1HgjcnACoXc89k1wivehxothp7r2xgweT2 A1zFqh5BlpGTxQFcxY8JhaOScFyZxlmnoBfm81RpsnGCWFqn8V0qYcyFY M1qAEBYrqPnCt5yKV3kGAL1hYSI+0xB0Gadsn4TpbHZo2AVp2FZYjcuKC w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10585"; a="350093771" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,311,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="350093771" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Jan 2023 06:09:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10585"; a="725179997" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,311,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="725179997" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2023 06:09:11 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pEspq-006VkL-01; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 16:09:10 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:09:09 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Niyas Sait Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, rafael@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, fugang.duan@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] pinctrl: add support for ACPI pin function and config resources Message-ID: References: <20221130164027.682898-2-niyas.sait@linaro.org> <24bf8b5d-d0ff-1d45-9c36-12bcc6fc3868@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:49:23PM +0000, Niyas Sait wrote: > On 20/12/2022 10:53, Niyas Sait wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > As discussed previously, I've put together a design for the pinctrl ACPI > > support in a google doc [1] > > > > Could you please have a look ? > > > > [1] > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bgLAOEGmhVnxSF_Bx6-blg1_ZNnv8BTQGYW6gixOvjY/edit?usp=sharing > > Did you get a chance to look at the design doc ? I started reading it before Xmas holidays and then other tasks overhent me. I'll prioritize this. > I am not sure if I missed any of your comments. > > Let me know if you have any feedback. P.S. Have you seen the ECR for the ACPI specification regarding pin numbering vs. GPIO numbering? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko