All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
	Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fbc: Avoid full proxy f_ops for FBC debug attributes
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:06:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7xlpbEDspHaT5Gq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7nQHfbKNmZ1sRbO@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>

On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 01:33:41AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > Hi Julia, thanks for helping here.
> > >
> > > So, my question is why this
> > >
> > > make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=context COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
> > >
> > > didn't catch this chunck:
> > >
> > > -		debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > > -				    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > > +		debugfs_create_file_unsafe("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > > +					   fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > >
> > > When I run it it only catches and replaces this:
> > >
> > > - DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(dsa_fops, dsa_get, dsa_set, dsa_fmt);
> > > + DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(dsa_fops, dsa_get, dsa_set, dsa_fmt);
> >
> > There is something strange in your question.  You have MODE=context but
> > you show the output for MODE=patch.  The rule dcf matches a call to
> > debugfs_create_file, and the context rule matching DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE
> > is only activated if dcf succeeds.  So when the context rule gives a
> > report, there is always a corresponding call to debugfs_create_file in the
> > same file, it is just not highlighted.  So the request is that it should
> > be highlighted as well?
> 
> Hello Rodrigo,
> Not trying to speak for you, but I think Julia's comment appears to be the
> correct interpretation of your observation. Would you mind confirming/clarifying
> and suggest next steps for this proposal?

doh! newby coccinelle user detected! My bad, sorry!

make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=patch COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

do shows everything.

So, could you please mention this line in the commit message so we don't forget that?

Also could you please provide patches for the other cases?
1 patch for each file is desirable in this case since it touches different areas.

> 
> Thank you,
> ./drv
> 
> >
> > julia
> >
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
	Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/fbc: Avoid full proxy f_ops for FBC debug attributes
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:06:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7xlpbEDspHaT5Gq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7nQHfbKNmZ1sRbO@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>

On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 01:33:41AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > Hi Julia, thanks for helping here.
> > >
> > > So, my question is why this
> > >
> > > make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=context COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
> > >
> > > didn't catch this chunck:
> > >
> > > -		debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > > -				    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > > +		debugfs_create_file_unsafe("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > > +					   fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > >
> > > When I run it it only catches and replaces this:
> > >
> > > - DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(dsa_fops, dsa_get, dsa_set, dsa_fmt);
> > > + DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(dsa_fops, dsa_get, dsa_set, dsa_fmt);
> >
> > There is something strange in your question.  You have MODE=context but
> > you show the output for MODE=patch.  The rule dcf matches a call to
> > debugfs_create_file, and the context rule matching DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE
> > is only activated if dcf succeeds.  So when the context rule gives a
> > report, there is always a corresponding call to debugfs_create_file in the
> > same file, it is just not highlighted.  So the request is that it should
> > be highlighted as well?
> 
> Hello Rodrigo,
> Not trying to speak for you, but I think Julia's comment appears to be the
> correct interpretation of your observation. Would you mind confirming/clarifying
> and suggest next steps for this proposal?

doh! newby coccinelle user detected! My bad, sorry!

make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=patch COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

do shows everything.

So, could you please mention this line in the commit message so we don't forget that?

Also could you please provide patches for the other cases?
1 patch for each file is desirable in this case since it touches different areas.

> 
> Thank you,
> ./drv
> 
> >
> > julia
> >
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Saurabh Singh Sengar" <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
	Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/fbc: Avoid full proxy f_ops for FBC debug attributes
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:06:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7xlpbEDspHaT5Gq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7nQHfbKNmZ1sRbO@ubun2204.myguest.virtualbox.org>

On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 01:33:41AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > Hi Julia, thanks for helping here.
> > >
> > > So, my question is why this
> > >
> > > make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=context COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
> > >
> > > didn't catch this chunck:
> > >
> > > -		debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > > -				    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > > +		debugfs_create_file_unsafe("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
> > > +					   fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
> > >
> > > When I run it it only catches and replaces this:
> > >
> > > - DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(dsa_fops, dsa_get, dsa_set, dsa_fmt);
> > > + DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(dsa_fops, dsa_get, dsa_set, dsa_fmt);
> >
> > There is something strange in your question.  You have MODE=context but
> > you show the output for MODE=patch.  The rule dcf matches a call to
> > debugfs_create_file, and the context rule matching DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE
> > is only activated if dcf succeeds.  So when the context rule gives a
> > report, there is always a corresponding call to debugfs_create_file in the
> > same file, it is just not highlighted.  So the request is that it should
> > be highlighted as well?
> 
> Hello Rodrigo,
> Not trying to speak for you, but I think Julia's comment appears to be the
> correct interpretation of your observation. Would you mind confirming/clarifying
> and suggest next steps for this proposal?

doh! newby coccinelle user detected! My bad, sorry!

make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=patch COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

do shows everything.

So, could you please mention this line in the commit message so we don't forget that?

Also could you please provide patches for the other cases?
1 patch for each file is desirable in this case since it touches different areas.

> 
> Thank you,
> ./drv
> 
> >
> > julia
> >
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-09 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-27  8:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/fbc: Avoid full proxy f_ops for FBC debug attributes Deepak R Varma
2022-12-27  8:00 ` Deepak R Varma
2022-12-27  8:00 ` Deepak R Varma
2022-12-27 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-27 17:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-27 17:13   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-27 18:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Deepak R Varma
2022-12-27 18:06     ` Deepak R Varma
2022-12-27 18:06     ` Deepak R Varma
2022-12-28 11:18     ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-28 11:18       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2022-12-28 11:18       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-03  6:10       ` [Intel-gfx] " Deepak R Varma
2023-01-03  6:10         ` Deepak R Varma
2023-01-03  6:10         ` Deepak R Varma
2023-01-04 17:51         ` [Intel-gfx] " Julia Lawall
2023-01-04 17:51           ` Julia Lawall
2023-01-04 17:51           ` Julia Lawall
2023-01-04 18:05           ` [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-04 18:05             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-04 18:05             ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-05  8:13             ` [Intel-gfx] " Julia Lawall
2023-01-05  8:13               ` Julia Lawall
2023-01-05  8:13               ` Julia Lawall
2023-01-07 20:03               ` [Intel-gfx] " Deepak R Varma
2023-01-07 20:03                 ` Deepak R Varma
2023-01-07 20:03                 ` Deepak R Varma
2023-01-09 19:06                 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-01-09 19:06                   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-09 19:06                   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-10  6:50                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Deepak R Varma
2023-01-10  6:50                     ` Deepak R Varma
2023-01-10  6:50                     ` Deepak R Varma
2022-12-27 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-12-27 21:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y7xlpbEDspHaT5Gq@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=drv@mailo.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=ssengar@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.