All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	Daniel Marcovitch <dmarcovitch@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix pasid_state refcount dec hit 0 warning on pasid unbind
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:23:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8/32rScnCHTacQT@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230124104355.119166-2-vasant.hegde@amd.com>

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:43:53AM +0000, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> From: Daniel Marcovitch <dmarcovitch@nvidia.com>
> 
> When unbinding pasid - a race condition exists vs outstanding page faults.
> 
> To prevent this, the pasid_state object contains a refcount.
>     * set to 1 on pasid bind
>     * incremented on each ppr notification start
>     * decremented on each ppr notification done
>     * decremented on pasid unbind

I've no objection to this quick fix

But the issue here is using a refcount for something that is not a
refcount. This usage model is should just be a normal atomic if it is
only counting the number of notifications in progress.

To be a refcount to have to follow one of the standard refcount
patterns, ie get rid of the event queue and consistently do:

if (refcount_dec_and_test())
    free_pasid_state()

Which implies the ppr notification done can do a defered free of the
pasid_state.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-24 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-24 10:43 [PATCH 0/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix refcount related issues Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix pasid_state refcount dec hit 0 warning on pasid unbind Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 15:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-27  4:44     ` Vasant Hegde
2023-01-27 12:58       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Fix pasid_state->wq race Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 15:30   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/amd/iommu_v2: Prevent scheduling new ppr notifier during unbind_pasid Vasant Hegde
2023-01-24 15:33   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-27  4:58     ` Vasant Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8/32rScnCHTacQT@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dmarcovitch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.