From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351A2640 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id k8so6428517wrc.9 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 04:32:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xthF7iCDdDoJ+wYb8AViE4uLWbO2Q7orZV+yQZVrMx4=; b=Pjr+N/xavfSbgR7zdqgo14MrLpP0avzLCQbLpQK6yqQqdiXP3GX/IpfOArzlAA16GE O5LM0PtyNOwIvra63ivWh3PZQcxoBuWD5bquLqWPJfj+jztKXt2ILaQuS1pWh4Yn0wFf XaKFVmJF0jy8DHI7q0wghBn80YnETqJzRaGE9dU7orqm94iXwt2x8Gt/RKDrJlvEYB7i 50xoqzHM+mFxcLPDFLsrYTxbbwP+6o0OPbabunKXakqGx+Rl6bjXTlZkSHBARWdVL+hb 9zWPvl7kqacikdUp6+zCYAMPjC4oJTHB4q3diTzj0MycL+MLmsYIs4xNRCwZXNqEVboM J0aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=xthF7iCDdDoJ+wYb8AViE4uLWbO2Q7orZV+yQZVrMx4=; b=X7vrYv5nk3KDbH7jqk18ihLopAkKZ47WLTfiYd9V/YCoMz/xIBb8rnH+yxwyAMdF/b eC+iw6lrsDs12LJiu19pEaEmJIcooVoD/H8FdZhYNWo0ELuSKJBnY0A5AAy2+sCJTfJe IuSRB9uxu90A+JEkUK3jTs20Meunbxb9Sc+0McI5/0OlynQdcWtjeoz8LiKcHnqu/67s 36xCJwgEy5n4N9U/72bM3MDOBqCtJaI+Xe/bP0H6wt8dPSzm7hIIDV/ayiazizAZZSKx RkoI87u0xphl7uaex91CpAc0EbtOkaCw3udkML+amJkBtw/T386g/8tfqVrUbKlQtDxv v6+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqXxCJx0X9npFpB9dOa+iRYUOpv+PT+o1t3JzgsksHmgAhntNjS 58KA32Evq5YiVUeGoOsDSRY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuhNdYtTkhsqB3G9TvD9iQQ0ny+B78134u28yGkGmU4BxNeRHWEzpryVSFZTy0jCIzlCMHr5w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5e91:0:b0:2b8:fe58:d368 with SMTP id ck17-20020a5d5e91000000b002b8fe58d368mr20984993wrb.29.1673613160451; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 04:32:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([2a10:d582:3bb:0:63f8:f640:f53e:dd47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f8-20020a0560001b0800b002423edd7e50sm18688009wrz.32.2023.01.13.04.32.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 04:32:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:32:38 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/10] 5.15.88-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230112135326.689857506@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230112135326.689857506@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:56:37PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.88 release. > There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:53:18 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221127): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2629 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2632 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2635 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip