diff for duplicates of <Y8MRZQENua+wi34T@spud> diff --git a/N1/1.1.hdr b/N1/1.1.hdr new file mode 100644 index 0000000..149ab5e --- /dev/null +++ b/N1/1.1.hdr @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 +Content-Disposition: inline +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.1.txt similarity index 92% rename from a/1.txt rename to N1/1.1.txt index fe6018a..dad7ad9 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.1.txt @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Hello again! On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: -> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote: +> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:19 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang: > > > > riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() currently only scans a limited set of > > > > cpufeatures, explicitly defined with macros. Extend it to probe for all @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > yesterday here [*]. It seems we need the concept of cpufeatures, which > > may be extensions or non-extensions. > > -> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx at xhacker/ +> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx@xhacker/ > > > > > See Palmer's series [0]. > > > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ these ALT_FOO macros out to a massive degree with that sort of approach. > that? I dunno, maybe that is whatever the corollary of "premature > optimisation" is for this discussion. > -> That's my unsolicited ? 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the +> That's my unsolicited € 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the > assumptions I made. The order in which an alternative is added to the macro does matter, @@ -133,11 +133,3 @@ that I realised I might have a gap in my understanding after all.. > IMO using cpufeature seems to make more sense for a general use API that > may be used later on for the likes of unaligned access, even if > initially it is not used for anything other than extensions. - --------------- next part -------------- -A non-text attachment was scrubbed... -Name: signature.asc -Type: application/pgp-signature -Size: 228 bytes -Desc: not available -URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/attachments/20230114/9feb1671/attachment-0001.sig> diff --git a/N1/1.2.bin b/N1/1.2.bin new file mode 100644 index 0000000..11ea0c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/N1/1.2.bin @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY8MRZQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi +0vudAQC31tiRjpcm56PHIfs6Gzs96iGhXmnQpnSLSDyU1//0OAD/ZEgoRPzZTxTs +ypTdSCOrUmPymftzpD1JpKKAJ0Cafwc= +=HM7X +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- diff --git a/N1/1.2.hdr b/N1/1.2.hdr new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e5352c --- /dev/null +++ b/N1/1.2.hdr @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" diff --git a/N1/2.hdr b/N1/2.hdr new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b86001 --- /dev/null +++ b/N1/2.hdr @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +Content-Disposition: inline diff --git a/N1/2.txt b/N1/2.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e409076 --- /dev/null +++ b/N1/2.txt @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +_______________________________________________ +linux-riscv mailing list +linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d874aa7..7ff914f 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,16 +4,29 @@ "ref\020230112092136.f2g43hrhmrqouy4y@orel\0" "ref\0Y8F2YxMHUt+djhX4@wendy\0" "From\0Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v3 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions\0" "Date\0Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:32:37 +0000\0" - "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" - "\00:1\0" + "To\0Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>" + " Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" + "Cc\0Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>" + " Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>" + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> + Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> + Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + kvm@vger.kernel.org + " kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" + "\02:1.1\0" "b\0" "Hello again!\n" "\n" "On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:\n" "> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:\n" - "> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:\n" + "> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St\303\274bner wrote:\n" "> > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:19 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:\n" "> > > > riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() currently only scans a limited set of\n" "> > > > cpufeatures, explicitly defined with macros. Extend it to probe for all\n" @@ -39,7 +52,7 @@ "> > yesterday here [*]. It seems we need the concept of cpufeatures, which\n" "> > may be extensions or non-extensions.\n" "> > \n" - "> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx at xhacker/\n" + "> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx@xhacker/\n" "> > \n" "> > > See Palmer's series [0].\n" "> > > \n" @@ -116,7 +129,7 @@ "> that? I dunno, maybe that is whatever the corollary of \"premature\n" "> optimisation\" is for this discussion.\n" "> \n" - "> That's my unsolicited ? 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the\n" + "> That's my unsolicited \342\202\254 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the\n" "> assumptions I made.\n" "\n" "The order in which an alternative is added to the macro does matter,\n" @@ -143,14 +156,22 @@ "> made here?\n" "> IMO using cpufeature seems to make more sense for a general use API that\n" "> may be used later on for the likes of unaligned access, even if\n" - "> initially it is not used for anything other than extensions.\n" + > initially it is not used for anything other than extensions. + "\02:1.2\0" + "fn\0signature.asc\0" + "b\0" + "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" "\n" - "-------------- next part --------------\n" - "A non-text attachment was scrubbed...\n" - "Name: signature.asc\n" - "Type: application/pgp-signature\n" - "Size: 228 bytes\n" - "Desc: not available\n" - URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/attachments/20230114/9feb1671/attachment-0001.sig> + "iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY8MRZQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi\n" + "0vudAQC31tiRjpcm56PHIfs6Gzs96iGhXmnQpnSLSDyU1//0OAD/ZEgoRPzZTxTs\n" + "ypTdSCOrUmPymftzpD1JpKKAJ0Cafwc=\n" + "=HM7X\n" + "-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" + "\01:2\0" + "b\0" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-riscv mailing list\n" + "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv -7182383aeca1071bd39d51d6d98c16671da4df5aa600cfe491fd6ef09a6a6d1f +f60052005479b5671189103396e7e0f56510679559e6b5fab0acac9746411784
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index fe6018a..dad7ad9 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Hello again! On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: -> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote: +> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:19 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang: > > > > riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() currently only scans a limited set of > > > > cpufeatures, explicitly defined with macros. Extend it to probe for all @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > yesterday here [*]. It seems we need the concept of cpufeatures, which > > may be extensions or non-extensions. > > -> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx at xhacker/ +> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx@xhacker/ > > > > > See Palmer's series [0]. > > > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ these ALT_FOO macros out to a massive degree with that sort of approach. > that? I dunno, maybe that is whatever the corollary of "premature > optimisation" is for this discussion. > -> That's my unsolicited ? 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the +> That's my unsolicited € 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the > assumptions I made. The order in which an alternative is added to the macro does matter, @@ -133,11 +133,3 @@ that I realised I might have a gap in my understanding after all.. > IMO using cpufeature seems to make more sense for a general use API that > may be used later on for the likes of unaligned access, even if > initially it is not used for anything other than extensions. - --------------- next part -------------- -A non-text attachment was scrubbed... -Name: signature.asc -Type: application/pgp-signature -Size: 228 bytes -Desc: not available -URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/attachments/20230114/9feb1671/attachment-0001.sig> diff --git a/N2/2.bin b/N2/2.bin new file mode 100644 index 0000000..11ea0c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/N2/2.bin @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- + +iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY8MRZQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi +0vudAQC31tiRjpcm56PHIfs6Gzs96iGhXmnQpnSLSDyU1//0OAD/ZEgoRPzZTxTs +ypTdSCOrUmPymftzpD1JpKKAJ0Cafwc= +=HM7X +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- diff --git a/N2/2.hdr b/N2/2.hdr new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e5352c --- /dev/null +++ b/N2/2.hdr @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index d874aa7..da1679d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -4,16 +4,29 @@ "ref\020230112092136.f2g43hrhmrqouy4y@orel\0" "ref\0Y8F2YxMHUt+djhX4@wendy\0" "From\0Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v3 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions\0" "Date\0Sat, 14 Jan 2023 20:32:37 +0000\0" - "To\0kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" - "\00:1\0" + "To\0Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>" + " Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>\0" + "Cc\0Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>" + " Heiko St\303\274bner <heiko@sntech.de>" + Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> + Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> + Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> + Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> + Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> + Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> + linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + kvm@vger.kernel.org + " kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org\0" + "\01:1\0" "b\0" "Hello again!\n" "\n" "On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:18:59PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:\n" "> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21:36AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:\n" - "> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:\n" + "> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:29:57AM +0100, Heiko St\303\274bner wrote:\n" "> > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:19 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:\n" "> > > > riscv_cpufeature_patch_func() currently only scans a limited set of\n" "> > > > cpufeatures, explicitly defined with macros. Extend it to probe for all\n" @@ -39,7 +52,7 @@ "> > yesterday here [*]. It seems we need the concept of cpufeatures, which\n" "> > may be extensions or non-extensions.\n" "> > \n" - "> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx at xhacker/\n" + "> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y77xyNPNqnFQUqAx@xhacker/\n" "> > \n" "> > > See Palmer's series [0].\n" "> > > \n" @@ -116,7 +129,7 @@ "> that? I dunno, maybe that is whatever the corollary of \"premature\n" "> optimisation\" is for this discussion.\n" "> \n" - "> That's my unsolicited ? 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the\n" + "> That's my unsolicited \342\202\254 0.02, hopefully I wasn't off-base with the\n" "> assumptions I made.\n" "\n" "The order in which an alternative is added to the macro does matter,\n" @@ -143,14 +156,16 @@ "> made here?\n" "> IMO using cpufeature seems to make more sense for a general use API that\n" "> may be used later on for the likes of unaligned access, even if\n" - "> initially it is not used for anything other than extensions.\n" + > initially it is not used for anything other than extensions. + "\01:2\0" + "fn\0signature.asc\0" + "b\0" + "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" "\n" - "-------------- next part --------------\n" - "A non-text attachment was scrubbed...\n" - "Name: signature.asc\n" - "Type: application/pgp-signature\n" - "Size: 228 bytes\n" - "Desc: not available\n" - URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kvm-riscv/attachments/20230114/9feb1671/attachment-0001.sig> + "iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCY8MRZQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi\n" + "0vudAQC31tiRjpcm56PHIfs6Gzs96iGhXmnQpnSLSDyU1//0OAD/ZEgoRPzZTxTs\n" + "ypTdSCOrUmPymftzpD1JpKKAJ0Cafwc=\n" + "=HM7X\n" + "-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" -7182383aeca1071bd39d51d6d98c16671da4df5aa600cfe491fd6ef09a6a6d1f +2888e70c0b6f152d752c69861ebe3af7e1da27eeb591d24916efda3d49aa1f6e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.