From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, wangbiao3@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/core: Fix use-after-free bug in dup_user_cpus_ptr()" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 09:55:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8O/go30PWPwLwIs@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41a01c47-ebf6-49c5-45f0-5d03a2a3b805@redhat.com>
* Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/14/23 14:33, Waiman Long wrote:
> > On 1/14/23 14:28, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > On 1/14/23 04:53, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
> > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > > id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
> > > >
> > > > Possible dependencies:
> > > >
> > > > 87ca4f9efbd7 ("sched/core: Fix use-after-free bug in
> > > > dup_user_cpus_ptr()")
> > > > 8f9ea86fdf99 ("sched: Always preserve the user requested cpumask")
> > > > 713a2e21a513 ("sched: Introduce affinity_context")
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> > > >
> > > > From 87ca4f9efbd7cc649ff43b87970888f2812945b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> > > > Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 23:11:19 -0500
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix use-after-free bug in
> > > > dup_user_cpus_ptr()
> > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > > >
> > > > Since commit 07ec77a1d4e8 ("sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be
> > > > restricted on asymmetric systems"), the setting and clearing of
> > > > user_cpus_ptr are done under pi_lock for arm64 architecture. However,
> > > > dup_user_cpus_ptr() accesses user_cpus_ptr without any lock
> > > > protection. Since sched_setaffinity() can be invoked from another
> > > > process, the process being modified may be undergoing fork() at
> > > > the same time. When racing with the clearing of user_cpus_ptr in
> > > > __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked(), it can lead to user-after-free and
> > > > possibly double-free in arm64 kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Commit 8f9ea86fdf99 ("sched: Always preserve the user requested
> > > > cpumask") fixes this problem as user_cpus_ptr, once set, will never
> > > > be cleared in a task's lifetime. However, this bug was re-introduced
> > > > in commit 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in
> > > > do_set_cpus_allowed()") which allows the clearing of user_cpus_ptr in
> > > > do_set_cpus_allowed(). This time, it will affect all arches.
> > > >
> > > > Fix this bug by always clearing the user_cpus_ptr of the newly
> > > > cloned/forked task before the copying process starts and check the
> > > > user_cpus_ptr state of the source task under pi_lock.
> > > >
> > > > Note to stable, this patch won't be applicable to stable releases.
> > > > Just copy the new dup_user_cpus_ptr() function over.
> > >
> > > I have a note here about what to do when backporting to stable. Just
> > > copy the new function over will be fine.
> >
> > That will be before the application of the subsequent patch which will
> > modify it in a way for suitable for stable. I can send out a separate
> > stable patch for that later today.
>
> The attached patch will apply to linux-6.1.y as well as linux-5.15.y.
Thanks!
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-15 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-14 9:53 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/core: Fix use-after-free bug in dup_user_cpus_ptr()" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2023-01-14 19:28 ` Waiman Long
2023-01-14 19:33 ` Waiman Long
2023-01-15 2:26 ` Waiman Long
2023-01-15 8:01 ` Greg KH
2023-01-15 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8O/go30PWPwLwIs@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangbiao3@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.