From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D7723A8 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id bg13-20020a05600c3c8d00b003d9712b29d2so25686145wmb.2 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:27:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FU6WkRe9hFxrq6Tsp3Ga9E9BKQlPB/TCyToG9zfxCJ0=; b=b4kpqDx2WsKMvlHqzDeSu6ChAc0tfgEWDAp437Bh67E7HOkGw0ynbhjkuEs0vxKYrD yGKWmmQVeC+n/6ueSyCe/Fkt+SLkQn1kAVC4iYbp4RnEquilY9dVJQTyaBwYE+q88esN +DrRK0FZmodXetCtOeJCkWOJYyIa/imjIbrl8TY+l8B5ALvDxd+/MaJwfvgDYrkCUokU fSGZW1I/98mwRiPCVycsDA7PRn0ILxdzFjx+N0sUr1xX5eh90Dfj7D/cmZ9dVT1HMEZY 3aFSvp72Xk/8YWBarU6soeVESKC15lSCq9zjaPVcQ5riVxcrsCusc7hewPwlw8vj9U8Q uriQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=FU6WkRe9hFxrq6Tsp3Ga9E9BKQlPB/TCyToG9zfxCJ0=; b=B/JSVS0GPN/g75vuMu6/0nIy5TmJTBB6+VQ1Jf8cfnxQJnOBlIk+aQX3Cp9YQARCrE 1hzFANLm2mBHr3i8jVfV9fqXp8jvm5RdfYjmVGiHjM45x1DAGPUjtiC4W7Tc5dxVUtau zFRnRYul1PsRawv/SL3xjvASufmww50a9TkS1ECIQt6ss49MfmQ+kcIr3l1tG9Q/oCT4 Q25HDrJnAH5Ekbn4LjziYJguxmYAnqB0duXAzPtQN6imSU7JbFIYEcdsrT9sJDEgGWz2 FBHy+4LjOacsAx7X/ywW/wrHmshkSOZjzGMXvNHr3YVPQD4YoiwYhzYw+urnfnXrrfmR FqtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2ko9b5i5gLEhjTqtgtsWpS9j71k/u7ozfTQEz6nQ14PKfIave7kw URZ0Pn6nY3PdxoR6nbkfgkM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXujlnw4ci9b9SeAJHZulwAMVjpFlu82KQ4ygtwCl3APlFIiWWhyC32b+ajc0TPIt9ptRZzFaw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb88:0:b0:3d9:f801:73bf with SMTP id m8-20020a7bcb88000000b003d9f80173bfmr3001591wmi.12.1673958433866; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:27:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([67.208.52.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k30-20020a05600c1c9e00b003d9b89a39b2sm40832747wms.10.2023.01.17.04.27.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:27:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:27:06 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/521] 4.19.270-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230116154847.246743274@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230116154847.246743274@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:44:22PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.270 release. > There are 521 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> fails s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: riscv build fails with the error: arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'walk_stackframe': arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c:66:36: error: 'struct pt_regs' has no member named 'epc'; did you mean 'sepc'? 66 | if (regs && (regs->epc == pc) && (frame->fp & 0x7)) { | ^~~ Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2659 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip