From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com (mail-wm1-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A9E23A8 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id m15so906993wms.4 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:29:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sIPwfdU6WBiamrmleJs7zzgMl1VkSUfaRUm8g+vAhuo=; b=Hp/fhK1xj2ToriNTJOVi6I9HW8OWuN67U4w0giHmfYvaSFu6n4GRy/LiPXju4Np+YG NAJxgilmF+gZda677dOo7Wu8nfIRVdWWvEtRJXge/Poyfjc9YA2oG4Rs2rye0Y8fNr4k VRet7LOckPHPAyiyDk1gCMIyoyG0uREJnYiZxMZ9AUkZRkaDGWsFsbPmMwIvLoyqQ0qc MeQCb12I+duEuPXL4IAK1Dn97fPttzNZNI3LsrbrUu4A7N3woYpkuL34kN3b6BXeSMCl Kkup1q9hJsxbk2oD9Zpstv6aeh+E9adRETir60KMwD7iHf7u/2MY/XLphtau0QCWIMKo 9woA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=sIPwfdU6WBiamrmleJs7zzgMl1VkSUfaRUm8g+vAhuo=; b=B82I4cqK8+V7jUbV/g6f6AQJ3QKRzhFubgmzAFNo0hy9A/JdYuoqoy5UbSCb7POyXD L25u1EDA+USOqzicUkCQDqLXEQ2GxCkoGeJ+dfqsQ0RFq9SwoXU9iWiZXgj/eXEMQQtd cHCpy/IXfYykvTE8Ph+B1d+YxQlz5mdCo6YvBs5Q7wLlW2a/CIUTMpyXIRPrX7OzgdZX JVrXTEaJus2fI4yO6k0I1FwYObWyj+sZg4EcZuWSIw5itjcaWtauaYrew1zvNkbFSVF2 6xRvwV6DSmHutdFY6y2EDtdU4sBReZ1Kpu/hd5ID//kx1FOpq+Y6FaKZASfT4pM1ZEcH s5uQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqHzapEugJzXq8km0oGO3i2xh+h4PBjhQ0ta9b0PBzksqwv/wd0 In0Oq/L4kmPNPRMYhC3j93E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXuBD+g9X/0JHy10W5gsLH9p4UhqxemkZGOEXUTWwojs0GPVspnvFRhKsj3NYwLibqChHi+Smw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4691:b0:3d3:4877:e556 with SMTP id p17-20020a05600c469100b003d34877e556mr3056177wmo.29.1673958571903; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([67.208.52.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay15-20020a05600c1e0f00b003dab77aa911sm10068209wmb.23.2023.01.17.04.29.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 04:29:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:29:29 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/658] 5.4.229-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230116154909.645460653@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230116154909.645460653@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 04:41:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.229 release. > There are 658 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> fails s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: riscv build fails with the error (same error as v4.19.270-rc1) arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'walk_stackframe': arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c:66:36: error: 'struct pt_regs' has no member named 'epc'; did you mean 'sepc'? 66 | if (regs && (regs->epc == pc) && (frame->fp & 0x7)) { | ^~~ Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2660 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip