From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8045C38147 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229919AbjARQHf (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:07:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41570 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230204AbjARQG4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:06:56 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org (netrider.rowland.org [192.131.102.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0890753E53 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 211745 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Jan 2023 11:03:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:03:35 -0500 From: Alan Stern To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Andrea Parri , Jonas Oberhauser , Peter Zijlstra , will , "boqun.feng" , npiggin , dhowells , "j.alglave" , "luc.maranget" , akiyks , dlustig , joel , urezki , quic_neeraju , frederic , Kernel development list Subject: Re: Internal vs. external barriers (was: Re: Interesting LKMM litmus test) Message-ID: References: <20230116190652.GZ2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230116221357.GA2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230117151416.GI2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230117174308.GK2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230118051704.GX2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230118051704.GX2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:17:04PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:15:15PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > Maybe we don't. Please test the patch below; I think it will do what > > you want -- and it doesn't rule out nesting. > > It works like a champ on manual/kernel/C-srcu*.litmus in the litmus > repository on github, good show and thank you!!! > > I will make more tests, and am checking this against the rest of the > litmus tests in the repo, but in the meantime would you be willing to > have me add your Signed-off-by? I'll email a real patch submission in the not-too-distant future, assuming you don't find any problems with the new code. Alan