From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 12:32:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8p76dkw4XCGcMYF@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230120074217.GB26815@lst.de>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 08:42:17AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 07:50:09PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > After this patch same check in the end of the vunmap() becomes odd
> > because we fail a vmap() call on its entry if VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
> > flag is set. See the [1] patch in this series.
> >
> > Is there any reason for such duplication?
>
> Mostly just documentation for me to explain why no flushing is needed.
> But I can drop it.
>
Thanks.
--
Uladzislau Rezki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-20 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 10:02 cleanup vfree and vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] vmalloc: reject vmap with VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:46 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: remove __vfree Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: remove __vfree_deferred Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:47 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: move vmalloc_init and free_work down in vmalloc.c Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: call vfree instead of __vunmap from delayed_vfree_work Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: move __remove_vm_area out of va_remove_mappings Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-20 7:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-20 11:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: use remove_vm_area in __vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: move debug checks from __vunmap to remove_vm_area Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:50 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-20 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-20 11:32 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2023-01-19 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: refactor va_remove_mappings Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-19 18:50 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-01-19 16:45 ` cleanup vfree and vunmap Uladzislau Rezki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-21 7:10 Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-21 7:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: split __vunmap Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-23 10:47 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8p76dkw4XCGcMYF@pc636 \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.