From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Michal Prívozník" <mprivozn@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Leonardo Bras Soares Passos" <lsoaresp@redhat.com>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] util/userfaultfd: Support /dev/userfaultfd
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 12:26:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9K31a04dTChnaOV@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9KjZeu9t37XyZ3q@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:59:33PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:25:05AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 02:15:11PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Michal Prívozník (mprivozn@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > On 1/25/23 23:40, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > > The new /dev/userfaultfd handle is superior to the system call with a
> > > > > better permission control and also works for a restricted seccomp
> > > > > environment.
> > > > >
> > > > > The new device was only introduced in v6.1 so we need a header update.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please have a look, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering whether it would make sense/be possible for mgmt app
> > > > (libvirt) to pass FD for /dev/userfaultfd instead of QEMU opening it
> > > > itself. But looking into the code, libvirt would need to do that when
> > > > spawning QEMU because that's when QEMU itself initializes internal state
> > > > and queries userfaultfd caps.
> > >
> > > You also have to be careful about what the userfaultfd semantics are; I
> > > can't remember them - but if you open it in one process and pass it to
> > > another process, which processes address space are you trying to
> > > monitor?
> >
> > Yes it's a problem. The kernel always fetches the current mm_struct* which
> > represents the current context of virtual address space when creating the
> > uffd handle (for either the syscall or the ioctl() approach).
>
> At what point does the process address space get associated ? When
> the /dev/userfaultfd is opened, or only when ioctl(USERFAULTFD_IOC_NEW)
> is called ? If it is the former, then we have no choice, QEMU must open
> it. if it is the latter, then libvirt can open /dev/userfaultfd, pass
> it to QEMU which can then do the ioctl(USERFAULTFD_IOC_NEW).
Good point.. It should be the latter, so should be doable.
What should be the best interface for QEMU to detect the fd passing over to
it? IIUC qemu_open() requires the name to be /dev/fdset/*, but there's no
existing cmdline that QEMU can know which fd number to fetch from fdset to
be used as the /dev/userfaultfd descriptor.
monitor_get_fd() seems more proper, where we can define an unique string so
Libvirt can preset the descriptor with the same string attached to it, then
I can opt-in monitor_get_fd() before trying to open() or doing the syscall.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-25 22:40 [PATCH 0/3] util/userfaultfd: Support /dev/userfaultfd Peter Xu
2023-01-25 22:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] linux-headers: Update to v6.1 Peter Xu
2023-01-25 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] util/userfaultfd: Add uffd_open() Peter Xu
2023-01-25 23:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-26 15:58 ` Peter Xu
2023-01-25 22:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] util/userfaultfd: Support /dev/userfaultfd Peter Xu
2023-01-25 23:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-26 17:33 ` Peter Xu
2023-01-26 9:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 9:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 20:03 ` Peter Xu
2023-01-26 14:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Michal Prívozník
2023-01-26 14:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2023-01-26 15:25 ` Peter Xu
2023-01-26 15:29 ` Michal Prívozník
2023-01-26 15:49 ` Peter Xu
2023-01-26 15:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 17:26 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-01-31 19:48 ` Peter Xu
2023-01-31 20:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-31 21:01 ` Peter Xu
2023-02-01 7:55 ` Michal Prívozník
2023-02-01 14:58 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9K31a04dTChnaOV@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lsoaresp@redhat.com \
--cc=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.