All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
	paulmck@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk, luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com,
	dlustig@nvidia.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com,
	quic_neeraju@quicinc.com, frederic@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] tools/memory-model: Make ppo a subrelation of po
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 23:14:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9WeOTmGCCfjMUtG@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9V+CyKIjg8sgVAC@rowland.harvard.edu>

> Evidently the plain-coherence check rules out x=1 at the 
> end, because when I relax that check, x=1 becomes a possible result.  
> Furthermore, the graphical output confirms that this execution has a 
> ww-incoh edge from Wx=2 to Wx=1.  But there is no ww-vis edge from Wx=1 
> to Wx=2!  How can this be possible?  It seems like a bug in herd7.

By default, herd7 performs some edges removal when generating the
graphical outputs.  The option -showraw can be useful to increase
the "verbosity", for example,

  [with "exists (x=2)", output in /tmp/T.dot]
  $ herd7 -conf linux-kernel.cfg T.litmus -show prop -o /tmp -skipchecks plain-coherence -doshow ww-vis -showraw ww-vis


> Furthermore, the execution with x=2 at the end doesn't have either a 
> ww-vis or a ww-nonrace edge betwen Wx=1 and Wx=2.  So why isn't there a 
> ww-race edge?

And similarly

  [with "exists (x=2)"]
  $ herd7 -conf linux-kernel.cfg T.litmus -show prop -o /tmp -doshow ww-vis,ww-nonrace -showraw ww-vis,ww-nonrace

  Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-28 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 13:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] Streamlining treatment of smp_mb__after_unlock_lock Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-26 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/memory-model: Unify UNLOCK+LOCK pairings to po-unlock-lock-po Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-26 16:36   ` Alan Stern
2023-01-26 20:08     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-26 23:21       ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-27 13:18         ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-27 15:13           ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-27 15:57             ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-27 16:48               ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-26 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tools/memory-model: Make ppo a subrelation of po Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-26 16:36   ` Alan Stern
2023-01-27 14:31     ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-28 19:56       ` Alan Stern
2023-01-28 22:14         ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2023-01-28 22:21           ` Andrea Parri
2023-01-28 22:59           ` Alan Stern
2023-01-29  5:17             ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-29 16:03               ` Alan Stern
2023-01-29 16:21                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-29 17:28                   ` Andrea Parri
2023-01-29 18:44                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-29 21:43                       ` Boqun Feng
2023-01-29 23:09                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-30  2:18                           ` Alan Stern
2023-01-30  4:43                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-29 19:17                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-29 17:11             ` Andrea Parri
2023-01-29 22:10               ` Alan Stern
2023-01-29 22:19             ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-30  2:39               ` Alan Stern
2023-01-30  4:36                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-30 16:47                   ` Alan Stern
2023-01-30 16:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-01-31 13:56                 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-31 15:06                   ` Alan Stern
2023-01-31 15:33                     ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-31 16:55                       ` Alan Stern
2023-02-01 10:37                         ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-01-30  4:46               ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9WeOTmGCCfjMUtG@andrea \
    --to=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.