From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, <philippe.lecluse@intel.com>,
<mchehab@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 28/37] drm/xe: Don't use engine_mask until after hwconfig parse
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:51:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9ljGJwM9Ks/DabI@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112222538.2000142-29-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 05:25:29PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>
> The IRQ and MCR init used engine_mask before hwconfig parse (currently
> faked), move these steps after the hwconfig parse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 6cea15725cae..75150077d62c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include "xe_gt_sysfs.h"
> #include "xe_gt_topology.h"
> #include "xe_hw_fence.h"
> +#include "xe_irq.h"
> #include "xe_lrc.h"
> #include "xe_map.h"
> #include "xe_migrate.h"
> @@ -449,6 +450,12 @@ static int gt_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> if (err)
> goto err_force_wake;
>
> + /* Enables per hw engine IRQs */
> + xe_gt_irq_postinstall(gt);
> +
> + /* Rerun MCR init as we now have hw engine list */
> + xe_gt_mcr_init(gt);
> +
> err = xe_hw_engines_init_early(gt);
> if (err)
> goto err_force_wake;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> index edebe1817400..92fe6b38d735 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
> @@ -492,26 +492,32 @@ void xe_irq_reset(struct xe_device *xe)
> #endif
> }
>
> -void xe_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
> +void xe_gt_irq_postinstall(struct xe_gt *gt)
> {
> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> - u8 id;
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
>
> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> - if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210) {
> - dg1_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> - } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 11) {
> - gen11_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> - } else {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "No interrupt postinstall hook");
> - }
> - }
> + if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210)
> + dg1_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> + else if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 11)
> + gen11_irq_postinstall(xe, gt);
> + else
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "No interrupt postinstall hook");
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY)
> - gen11_display_irq_postinstall(xe);
> + if (gt->info.id == XE_GT0)
> + gen11_display_irq_postinstall(gt_to_xe(gt));
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void xe_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + struct xe_gt *gt;
> + u8 id;
> +
> + for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> + xe_gt_irq_postinstall(gt);
> +}
> +
> static irq_handler_t xe_irq_handler(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210) {
> @@ -566,8 +572,6 @@ int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - xe_irq_postinstall(xe);
> -
> return err;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> index 7aee8d259353..34ecf22b32d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.h
> @@ -7,8 +7,10 @@
> #define _XE_IRQ_H_
>
> struct xe_device;
> +struct xe_gt;
>
> int xe_irq_install(struct xe_device *xe);
> +void xe_gt_irq_postinstall(struct xe_gt *gt);
> void xe_irq_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_irq_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_irq_resume(struct xe_device *xe);
> --
> 2.38.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 22:25 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/37] Catching up since we went public Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/37] drm/msm: Fix compile error Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 18:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/37] drm/xe: Implement a local xe_mmio_wait32 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 18:49 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-01 4:44 ` Matthew Brost
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/37] drm/xe: Stop using i915's range_overflows_t macro Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/37] drm/xe: Let's return last value read on xe_mmio_wait32 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/37] drm/xe: Convert guc_ready to regular xe_mmio_wait32 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/37] drm/xe: Wait for success on guc done Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/37] drm/xe: Remove i915_utils dependency from xe_guc_pc Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/37] drm/xe: Stop using i915_utils in xe_wopcm Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/37] drm/xe: Let's avoid i915_utils in the xe_force_wake Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/37] drm/xe: Convert xe_mmio_wait32 to us so we can stop using wait_for_us Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/37] drm/xe: Remove i915_utils dependency from xe_pcode Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 12/37] drm/xe/migrate: Add kerneldoc for the migrate subsystem Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-20 23:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 13/37] drm/xe: Take memory ref on kernel job creation Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 14/37] drm/xe: Add intel_pps support too Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 15/37] drm/xe: Rework initialisation ordering slightly so we can inherit fb Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 16/37] drm/xe: Implement stolen memory Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 17/37] drm/xe: Allow fbdev to allocate " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 18/37] drm/xe: Implement initial hw readout for framebuffer Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:43 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 19/37] drm/xe: Put DPT into stolen memory, if available Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 20/37] drm/xe: Implement FBC support Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 21/37] drm/i915: Remove i915_drm_suspend_mode Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 22/37] drm/xe: Fix compilation when Xe driver is builtin Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 23/37] drm/xe: Fix dumb bo create Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 24/37] drm/i915: Expand force_probe to block probe of devices as well Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-20 23:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 25/37] drm/xe: Introduce force_probe parameter Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-20 23:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 26/37] Revert "drm/xe: Validate BO on CPU fault" Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:44 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 27/37] drm/xe: Ensure VMA not userptr before calling xe_bo_is_stolen Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-03 19:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 28/37] drm/xe: Don't use engine_mask until after hwconfig parse Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 18:51 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 29/37] drm/xe: Fake pulling gt->info.engine_mask from hwconfig blob Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 19:03 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 30/37] drm/xe/guc: Report submission version of GuC firmware Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 31/37] drm/xe/guc: s/xe_guc_send_mmio/xe_guc_mmio_send Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 32/37] drm/xe/guc: Add support GuC MMIO send / recv Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 33/37] drm/xe: Make FBC check stolen at use time Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 34/37] drm/xe: Move xe_ttm_stolen_mgr_init back Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 35/37] drm/xe: Fix hidden gotcha regression with bo create Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 36/37] drm/xe: Fix xe_mmio_wait32 timeouts Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-12 22:25 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 37/37] drm/xe: enforce GSMBASE for DG1 instead of BAR2 Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 15:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-24 16:25 ` Lecluse, Philippe
2023-01-31 19:11 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-01-31 19:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-02-01 9:12 ` Matthew Auld
2023-02-01 9:13 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9ljGJwM9Ks/DabI@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=philippe.lecluse@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.