Re: pull-request: mlx5-next 2023-01-24 V2

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 09:54:53AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:44:05 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > You don't remember me trying to convince you to keep the RoCE stuff
> > > away from our open source IPsec implementation?  
> > 
> > Huh? What does this:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1673960981.git.leon@kernel.org/
> > 
> > Have to do with IPsec?
> 
> Dunno. But I don't know what it has to do with the PR we're commenting
> on either..

It has to do, because I need shared branch to put net/mlx5 patches from
that "special keys" series and I patiently waited for any response.

First, I didn't see any comment of not pulling Saeed's PR.
Second, I didn't see any not-pulling comments other IPsec patches which
Saeed posted prior issuing his PR.
Third, IPsec patches are pure mlx5_core changes. This is where flow
steering exists.

➜  kernel git:(rdma-next) git diff --stat bb2e8913dc40..ml/mlx5-next
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Makefile             |   2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fs_tracepoint.c |   4 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/fs.h              |   1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h     |   1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c  |  59 ++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_cmd.c             |   6 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c            |  44 +++++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/ipsec_fs_roce.c  | 372 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/ipsec_fs_roce.h  |  20 +++
 include/linux/mlx5/fs.h                                      |   3 +
 10 files changed, 497 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Thanks