All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: "Íñigo Huguet" <ihuguet@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com,
	yangbo.lu@nxp.com, gerhard@engleder-embedded.com,
	habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com, ecree.xilinx@gmail.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, alex.maftei@amd.com,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: Re: PTP vclock: BUG: scheduling while atomic
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 17:33:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9vly2QNCxl3d2QL@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69d0ff33-bd32-6aa5-d36c-fbdc3c01337c@redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 05:02:07PM +0100, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> Our QA team was testing PTP vclocks, and they've found this error with sfc NIC/driver:
>   BUG: scheduling while atomic: ptp5/25223/0x00000002
> 
> The reason seems to be that vclocks disable interrupts with `spin_lock_irqsave` in
> `ptp_vclock_gettime`, and then read the timecounter, which in turns ends calling to
> the driver's `gettime64` callback.

The same issue was observed with the ice driver:
https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20221107/030633.html

I tried to fix it generally in the vclock support, but was not
successful. There was a hint it would be fixed in the driver. I'm not
sure what is the best approach here.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-02 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02 16:02 PTP vclock: BUG: scheduling while atomic Íñigo Huguet
2023-02-02 16:33 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2023-02-02 20:52   ` Jacob Keller
2023-02-03  0:10   ` Richard Cochran
2023-02-03 16:04     ` Íñigo Huguet
2023-02-03  9:09 ` Martin Habets

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9vly2QNCxl3d2QL@localhost \
    --to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.maftei@amd.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
    --cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihuguet@redhat.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.