From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Xu, Like" <like.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
eranian@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
wei.w.wang@intel.com, luwei.kang@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] perf: x86/ds: Handle guest PEBS overflow PMI and inject it to guest
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:01:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YAGEFgqQv281jVHc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c343e40-bbdf-8af0-3307-5274070ee3d2@intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:39:00AM +0800, Xu, Like wrote:
> > Why do we need to? Can't we simply always forward the PMI if the guest
> > has bits set in MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE ? Surely we can access the guest
> > MSRs at a reasonable rate..
> >
> > Sure, it'll send too many PMIs, but is that really a problem?
>
> More vPMI means more guest irq handler calls and
> more PMI virtualization overhead.
Only if you have both guest and host PEBS. And in that case I really
can't be arsed about some overhead to the guest.
> In addition,
> the correctness of some workloads (RR?) depends on
> the correct number of PMIs and the PMI trigger times
> and virt may not want to break this assumption.
Are you sure? Spurious NMI/PMIs are known to happen anyway. We have far
too much code to deal with them.
> > > + * If PEBS interrupt threshold on host is not exceeded in a NMI, there
> > > + * must be a PEBS overflow PMI generated from the guest PEBS counters.
> > > + * There is no ambiguity since the reported event in the PMI is guest
> > > + * only. It gets handled correctly on a case by case base for each event.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note: KVM disables the co-existence of guest PEBS and host PEBS.
> > Where; I need a code reference here.
>
> How about:
>
> Note: KVM will disable the co-existence of guest PEBS and host PEBS.
> In the intel_guest_get_msrs(), when we have host PEBS ctrl bit(s) enabled,
> KVM will clear the guest PEBS ctrl enable bit(s) before vm-entry.
> The guest PEBS users should be notified of this runtime restriction.
Since you had me look at that function, can clean up that
CONFIG_RETPOLINE crud and replace it with static_call() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 13:15 [PATCH v3 00/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to enable Guest PEBS via DS Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Set MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE_EMON bit when vPMU is enabled Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Use IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to adjust features visibility Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Introduce the ctrl_mask value for fixed counter Like Xu
2021-01-13 18:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-14 1:58 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] perf: x86/ds: Handle guest PEBS overflow PMI and inject it to guest Like Xu
2021-01-13 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-13 18:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-14 3:39 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-15 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-01-15 14:30 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-15 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 15:12 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-25 8:26 ` Like Xu
2021-01-25 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-02 6:31 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-14 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-15 2:49 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-15 17:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-22 5:30 ` Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Reprogram guest PEBS event to emulate guest PEBS counter Like Xu
2021-01-15 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 13:53 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add IA32_PEBS_ENABLE MSR emulation for extended PEBS Like Xu
2021-01-05 21:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-07 12:38 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-15 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-15 15:29 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add IA32_DS_AREA MSR emulation to manage guest DS buffer Like Xu
2021-01-05 21:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-08 3:05 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add PEBS_DATA_CFG MSR emulation to support adaptive PEBS Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] KVM: x86: Set PEBS_UNAVAIL in IA32_MISC_ENABLE when PEBS is enabled Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Expose CPUIDs feature bits PDCM, DS, DTES64 Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Adjust precise_ip to emulate Ice Lake guest PDIR counter Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Disable guest PEBS when counters are cross-mapped Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hook to emulate pebs for cross-mapped counters Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] KVM: vmx/pmu: Limit pebs_interrupt_threshold in the guest DS area Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] KVM: vmx/pmu: Rewrite applicable_counters field in guest PEBS records Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Save guest pebs reset values when pebs is configured Like Xu
2021-01-04 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Adjust guest pebs reset values for crpss-mapped counters Like Xu
2021-01-14 19:10 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add support to enable Guest PEBS via DS Sean Christopherson
2021-01-15 2:02 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-15 17:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-15 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2021-01-15 18:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-01-15 19:11 ` Andi Kleen
2021-01-22 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-25 8:08 ` Like Xu
2021-01-25 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-25 12:07 ` Xu, Like
2021-01-25 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-25 12:53 ` Xu, Like
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YAGEFgqQv281jVHc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu@intel.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.