All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <YAHA4uBSLlnxxAbu@cmpxchg.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 6b9fcfc..b069366 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ this is the definition of an interface change breaking userspace, so
 I'm a bit surprised by your laid-back response.
 
 > > Fixes: 536d3bf261a2 ("mm: memcontrol: avoid workload stalls when lowering memory.high")
-> > Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> # 5.8+
+> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8+
 > 
 > Why is this worth backporting to stable? The behavior is different but I
 > do not think any of them is harmful.
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ causing real production problems for us. From stable-kernel-rules:
  - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
    problem..." type thing).
 
-> > Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
-> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
+> > Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
+> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
 > 
 > I am not against the patch. The existing interface doesn't provide any
 > meaningful feedback to the userspace anyway. User would have to re check
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index dcf0064..9082fd6 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,17 +1,16 @@
  "ref\020210112163011.127833-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org\0"
  "ref\020210113144654.GD22493@dhcp22.suse.cz\0"
- "ref\020210113144654.GD22493-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "From\0Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: prevent starvation when writing memory.high\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:20:50 -0500\0"
- "To\0Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>"
-  Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
-  Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
-  linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
-  cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
- " kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org\0"
+ "To\0Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>"
+  Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
+  Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
+  linux-mm@kvack.org
+  cgroups@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+ " kernel-team@fb.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 03:46:54PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:\n"
@@ -53,7 +52,7 @@
  "I'm a bit surprised by your laid-back response.\n"
  "\n"
  "> > Fixes: 536d3bf261a2 (\"mm: memcontrol: avoid workload stalls when lowering memory.high\")\n"
- "> > Cc: <stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> # 5.8+\n"
+ "> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8+\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Why is this worth backporting to stable? The behavior is different but I\n"
  "> do not think any of them is harmful.\n"
@@ -64,8 +63,8 @@
  " - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, \"This could be a\n"
  "   problem...\" type thing).\n"
  "\n"
- "> > Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>\n"
- "> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>\n"
+ "> > Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>\n"
+ "> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>\n"
  "> \n"
  "> I am not against the patch. The existing interface doesn't provide any\n"
  "> meaningful feedback to the userspace anyway. User would have to re check\n"
@@ -103,4 +102,4 @@
  "So I suggest instead of my fix here, we revert Roman's patch instead,\n"
  as it should no longer be needed. Thoughts?
 
-1e4128c137e81046a70a3770d6b774737ede590fb8620b05338d750a521d989a
+e192b22beb39879890a5b8388d92ff54f9acf311e7934c692bba5661649e9b70

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.