From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tony Battersby <tonyb@cybernetics.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@protonmail.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de>
Subject: Re: Kernel version numbers after 4.9.255 and 4.4.255
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:22:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YB5DmnPd/Er0+yem@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b12bac9-1b4e-ec4a-8a45-5eb3f1dbbeca@cybernetics.com>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:31:05PM -0500, Tony Battersby wrote:
> On 2/4/21 6:00 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > Agreed. But currently, sublevel won't "wrap", it will "overflow" to
> > patchlevel. And that might be a problem. So we might need to update the
> > header generation using e.g. "sublevel & 0xff" (wrap around) or
> > "sublevel > 255 : 255 : sublevel" (be monotonic and get stuck at 255).
> >
> > In both LINUX_VERSION_CODE generation and KERNEL_VERSION proper.
>
> My preference would be to be monotonic and get stuck at 255 to avoid
> breaking out-of-tree modules.
I really do not care about out-of-tree modules sorry, as there's nothing
we can do about them. And internal kernel apis are always changing,
even in stable/lts releases, so changing this type of thing for them
should not be a big deal as maintainers of this type of code always have
to do that.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-06 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 5:59 Kernel version numbers after 4.9.255 and 4.4.255 Jari Ruusu
2021-02-04 6:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-04 7:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-02-04 8:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-04 11:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2021-02-04 16:28 ` David Laight
2021-02-04 16:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-04 20:19 ` Christoph Biedl
2021-02-05 6:52 ` Greg KH
2021-02-05 17:31 ` Tony Battersby
2021-02-05 18:11 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 7:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-06 9:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 9:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-06 9:48 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 10:18 ` Hans Verkuil
2021-02-06 11:18 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-02-06 7:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-02-05 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2021-02-05 9:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-02-05 18:44 ` Pavel Machek
2021-02-06 7:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YB5DmnPd/Er0+yem@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=jariruusu@protonmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyb@cybernetics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.