diff for duplicates of <YBCuEaxZu0MuD3MW@google.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 695ff19..1445e60 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -36,3 +36,7 @@ case "B" is still in-progress. Checking for "count > 1" in the consumer instead of handling it in the producer (as you did) would lead to the consumer checking against the wrong range. I don't see a way to solve that without adding some amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary. +_______________________________________________ +kvmarm mailing list +kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu +https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 4e91d72..689d91c 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,31 +3,28 @@ "ref\0CAD=HUj5YMtSJY6ZO9TRXHDEfWRM1o3Lrm7nkz=G2VJ_oZ-c5mw@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: consider the hva in mmu_notifer retry\0" - "Date\0Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:04:33 +0000\0" + "Date\0Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:04:33 -0800\0" "To\0David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>\0" - "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>" - Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> - Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> - Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + "Cc\0Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>" kvm@vger.kernel.org - open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> - James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com> - Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu + Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> + Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> + Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> + Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> - linux-mips@vger.kernel.org - Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org - Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> - David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> - " Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>\0" + open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> + " Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Jan 26, 2021, David Stevens wrote:\n" @@ -67,6 +64,10 @@ "case \"B\" is still in-progress. Checking for \"count > 1\" in the consumer instead\n" "of handling it in the producer (as you did) would lead to the consumer checking\n" "against the wrong range. I don't see a way to solve that without adding some\n" - amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary. + "amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary.\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "kvmarm mailing list\n" + "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu\n" + https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm -4a828db4bce73653f43ae7275e5d6c57041f1470ac89844bcd4dbb1de8254721 +3913d8b6052cc1d79ede7ddf6910f403c683e783a27d1b71e8491bff57113ddd
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 4e91d72..c2ee211 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\0CAD=HUj5YMtSJY6ZO9TRXHDEfWRM1o3Lrm7nkz=G2VJ_oZ-c5mw@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: consider the hva in mmu_notifer retry\0" - "Date\0Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:04:33 +0000\0" + "Date\0Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:04:33 -0800\0" "To\0David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>\0" "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>" Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> @@ -69,4 +69,4 @@ "against the wrong range. I don't see a way to solve that without adding some\n" amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary. -4a828db4bce73653f43ae7275e5d6c57041f1470ac89844bcd4dbb1de8254721 +1fa633e24ff9cd0dc7abb50c8ef22f8913b86ad8a6a8f5b75e0d601331fac124
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 695ff19..67246f7 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -36,3 +36,8 @@ case "B" is still in-progress. Checking for "count > 1" in the consumer instead of handling it in the producer (as you did) would lead to the consumer checking against the wrong range. I don't see a way to solve that without adding some amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary. + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 4e91d72..8a52300 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -3,31 +3,31 @@ "ref\0CAD=HUj5YMtSJY6ZO9TRXHDEfWRM1o3Lrm7nkz=G2VJ_oZ-c5mw@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: consider the hva in mmu_notifer retry\0" - "Date\0Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:04:33 +0000\0" + "Date\0Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:04:33 -0800\0" "To\0David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>\0" - "Cc\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>" - Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> - Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> - Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> - Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> + "Cc\0Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>" kvm@vger.kernel.org - open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> - James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com> - Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + linux-mips@vger.kernel.org + Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu + Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> + Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> + Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> + Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com> - linux-mips@vger.kernel.org - Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> + Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com> + Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org - Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> - David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> - " Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>\0" + open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> + Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> + " Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Jan 26, 2021, David Stevens wrote:\n" @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ "case \"B\" is still in-progress. Checking for \"count > 1\" in the consumer instead\n" "of handling it in the producer (as you did) would lead to the consumer checking\n" "against the wrong range. I don't see a way to solve that without adding some\n" - amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary. + "amount of history, which I agree is unnecessary.\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -4a828db4bce73653f43ae7275e5d6c57041f1470ac89844bcd4dbb1de8254721 +6b057cd564bebb6a129520db7730d8e4633ac8d8d3c0679c4a933ee6a9d01303
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.