From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889A7C433DB for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC0E64E99 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 01:03:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3AC0E64E99 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DZPm01hsmzDsPr for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:03:44 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=66.111.4.27; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=LjMAfjlZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=cC2NJ5t5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DZPk7687nzDqRM for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:02:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEFE5C01AE; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:02:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 20:02:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=U+Ci9Db+j+OKTbfhIKfz4JUMTCl JSyzD+MljU4yJdRc=; b=LjMAfjlZjZer3gAhcHaR8ggCrvqUB4mc8kUdLebPOLr lWn21TkC7gn8iHnx2buRiPRkhGfY7ER3zqV/qVT3Z3JI7jmaKLZ3JoUX6I4vytSF 4htVYPQoGNtgwJFeyKYF20eCpaWqYeaxHgAJPyKu4QfM+E0NCgESRH94ttsRpGBL //ybA+WB50DyGKSt1oRakhdH7InViDYWGCkFomoF72bJlBqvhAq5J5n83zzbULuj FiNn9eHfIp4ARTJV+58Q+3yDzxRwtQkVq1fxlrV+3Z8QprNfgjxCxp4+gARJNZlS vVjFh/dEfcy3036BaZrZ8OGbCYBD/tY9q/Jjvrigjgg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=U+Ci9D b+j+OKTbfhIKfz4JUMTClJSyzD+MljU4yJdRc=; b=cC2NJ5t5gTZKjac72vJGC/ abRCvFHpOniGKFsRhKPHrTaUROg34poe/NAi96KxlLQUKobG9esA7LSmfjFh9JJL ZO68fsgR+VR+FOkz8/uI24pftYpQsHVTZNUisMqk1oG3lgxeGkegVQgHcJjsNM1x 98PYy3Mj1Klw1dofo1eQ8Uz1lJiNAoodinENHWOSW9TpfZZbuSX+f2yS+k9wag4S SH4WXU6dm9okMmuCX7IcDfQYJoz4ftHTZRVNKn8wllAFkrvs2m0M8D6boy4GkTMQ SxZ1vePICfQhx4qoWdx7u0tABPnQjKyZm+3/m+eTbRe23BcbHpPAiJwZOs2UUvmw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheeggdeftdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenfg hrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddv necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghksehsth iftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheehfeffgeekveehtdfhgfduhfeg fefgtdehhfektdelffevkefgueffhedtieenucfkphepjeeirddvhedtrdekgedrvdefie enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprght rhhitghksehsthiftgigrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 283EE240066; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:02:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 19:02:01 -0600 From: Patrick Williams To: Andrew Jeffery Subject: Re: Does openbmc implement NC-SI over MCTP over SMBus to obtain information? Message-ID: References: <380419ba.ece.1777679c335.Coremail.ouyangxuan10@163.com> <12175d11-f353-4926-a125-f01e59135113@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kGH5MgiybCwHUHF5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12175d11-f353-4926-a125-f01e59135113@www.fastmail.com> X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: www , "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" , benwei@fb.com, amithash@fb.com Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --kGH5MgiybCwHUHF5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:11:57AM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, at 19:03, www wrote: > > Dear all, > >=20 > > Does openbmc implement NC-SI over MCTP over SMBus to obtain information= ?=20 >=20 > Unfortunately not. There is an out-of-tree implementation of the SMBus MC= TP=20 > binding, but that needs some effort put into it for it to go anywhere. We= 're=20 > likely to see a socket-based AF_MCTP implementation before SMBus support = is=20 > merged in libmctp for the purposes of OpenBMC. >=20 > I haven't yet heard of anyone running NC-SI over MCTP so you might be bre= aking=20 > new ground on that front too :) CCing Ben and Amithash. I think we added some code recently on top of the Intel-BMC/libmctp to talk to an NC-SI NIC. --=20 Patrick Williams --kGH5MgiybCwHUHF5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmAh3wcACgkQqwNHzC0A wRnATxAAoaIsz/9DonAP5zoevqHrfuMWwfSRR2oyK8g4ZYem4DXo5pK3q6t2rY7r rOu2TLRnU4JjH/OFIgUzVjLQqmbgB3AI8Y+HJytGIcZ1lUZIAFvPd+Ntcpcni544 Nfsj6Y7RLUYfOq1zdI5hcuv0RgjSPjjTTncd5BuXehyrPhoLU3RrMliT4O8yYd/C Ux/Wbmt6SAjYLbRAL4dsRBGflX74IEeSW5c8gpQ32R0K4VBzgabGCefQGImASzZR 5REPOe1LzVcIq7ej/upRlqmcsXImSTPq+zIkrIMCIHf0uknfqQ2S5vp7nKAlHywV x2X4RJTOYGZURzp8r9rX6I+Vr9M9RtNrtLFBALH/WWtPY7qZVdCh8WlCWYoHhgzR pDoVyFJBwy3HjRB5MeBt8jEpmBZJOqCmpsBU0KlPzpxULoGMZ4vxTvmtX9B90VOB puYz3zxa+2CMUvKhoJmTfQKe+WXCEQ3vXuSskeZNpxxaMFjH0um1GTFFermPA3Mo vJJJXHzFfD9u1UY+g1cUyz9EHR+hRDGxmgFRIFKg5T3IIA0pNWMH0y1jc4rcZa5a huqKYRwdgwHtOrlFkf0QZ/eFXqetGR61G2J4WuZw0T6uzvzTruD0hnCvf7Cv7GK7 lLuY8+sHlVkOTuwF2lCq98UOo/ECkLtcjmJvAxfhBQbflLhhw6o= =jZpj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kGH5MgiybCwHUHF5--