All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jonny Barker <jonny@jonnybarker.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: your patch "KVM: x86: Update emulator context mode if SYSENTER xfers to 64-bit mode"
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:43:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCVeuxKYW2L6+pFs@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6032a7c3-94d3-0d53-4c94-4767b5a9d6c3@suse.com>

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> I've noticed this patch while routinely screening the stable
> kernel logs for issues we may also need to fix in Xen. Isn't
> a similar change needed in SYSCALL emulation when going from
> compat to 64-bit mode?

Yep, it is.  AMD's APM explicitly states that compat always transitions to long
mode.

I believe em_sysexit() is technically buggy as well, though in the opposite way,
as it doesn't set ctxt->mode when switching from long mode to compat mode.  But,
it explicitly truncates rdx before assigning to rip so that's likely a benign
bug, at least for now.

I don't see anything in em_rsm() that will fixup ctxt->mode, so I'm guessing an
SMI with a 64-bit RIP will be fatal, too.

__emulate_int_real() can't switch mode, and INTn and company aren't emulated in
protected mode.

assign_eip_far() does update ctxt->mode, so far call/ret aren't broken.

Given the number of flows that can potentially affect mode, and the difficulty
in testing them, I feel like x86_emulate_insn() should handle refreshing the
mode, or at least do a sanity check to verify that it was already updated.

Side topic, I'm super curious why Intel lets SYSRET return to compat mode, when
SYSCALL #UDs in compat mode...

      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10  9:13 your patch "KVM: x86: Update emulator context mode if SYSENTER xfers to 64-bit mode" Jan Beulich
2021-02-11 16:43 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YCVeuxKYW2L6+pFs@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jonny@jonnybarker.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.