Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests/acceptance: replace unstable apt.armbian.com URLs for orangepi-pc, cubieboard

[Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3342 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:00:54PM +0100, Niek Linnenbank wrote:
> Currently the automated acceptance tests for the Orange Pi PC and cubieboard
> machines are disabled by default. The tests for both machines require artifacts
> that are stored on the apt.armbian.com domain. Unfortunately, some of these artifacts
> have been removed from apt.armbian.com and it is uncertain whether more will be removed.
> 
> This commit moves the artifacts previously stored on apt.armbian.com to a different
> domain that is maintainted by me and retrieves them using the path: '/pub/qemu/<machine>/<artifact>'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 46 +++++++++-----------------
>  tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py      |  6 ++--
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Tested with:

  $ export AVOCADO_ALLOW_LARGE_STORAGE=1
  $ ./tests/venv/bin/avocado run \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_sata \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi\$ \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_initrd \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_sd \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_19_11 \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08 \
    tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_uboot_netbsd9 \
    tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd

Resulting in:

   JOB ID     : f767a43482aa90545e740120a44cba64ab07dd3a
   JOB LOG    : /home/cleber/avocado/job-results/job-2021-02-11T20.07-f767a43/job.log
    (1/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd: PASS (23.49 s)
    (2/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_sata: PASS (21.98 s)
    (3/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi: PASS (12.37 s)
    (4/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_initrd: PASS (33.78 s)
    (5/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_sd: PASS (45.47 s)
    (6/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_19_11: PASS (69.69 s)
    (7/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08: PASS (89.06 s)
    (8/9) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_uboot_netbsd9: PASS (40.82 s)
    (9/9) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd: PASS (61.19 s)
   RESULTS    : PASS 9 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0
   JOB TIME   : 398.87 s

Both "test_arm_orangepi_bionic_19_11" and
"test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08" barely made within the 90 seconds
timeout.  I realize that the system I used is quite limited, so I'll
let others reason about the increase of the timeout.

Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]