All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru,
	heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:04:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCcXikcgdTJxbelw@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610354218200130@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 465 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:36:58AM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Here is the backport, along with 2a499b452952 ("usb: dwc3: ulpi: fix checkpatch warning")
which makes backporting easy.

--
Regards
Sudip

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-usb-dwc3-ulpi-fix-checkpatch-warning.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 816 bytes --]

From 3445398b1ddd749dbf1fc3cac2eaad781aafea53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:30:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc3: ulpi: fix checkpatch warning

commit 2a499b45295206e7f3dc76edadde891c06cc4447 upstream

no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
index ec004c6d76f2..1f8f6163d47d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 
 static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc)
 {
-	unsigned count = 1000;
+	unsigned int count = 1000;
 	u32 reg;
 
 	while (count--) {
-- 
2.30.0


[-- Attachment #3: 0002-usb-dwc3-ulpi-Replace-CPU-based-busyloop-with-Protoc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3718 bytes --]

From 8157753de640fabd49e0f13764b2f663542f1a4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:50:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with
 Protocol-based one

commit fca3f138105727c3a22edda32d02f91ce1bf11c9 upstream

Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been
developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no
delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a
different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough
to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to
take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure
to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access
mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation.

Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked
with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created
so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read
operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended
register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the
time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO
operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the
DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays.

[1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1,
    October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36.

Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support")
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201210085008.13264-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
index 1f8f6163d47d..44f1a496633c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
  */
 
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/time64.h>
 #include <linux/ulpi/regs.h>
 
 #include "core.h"
@@ -20,12 +22,22 @@
 		DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \
 		DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a))
 
-static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc)
+#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY	DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L)
+
+static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read)
 {
+	unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
 	unsigned int count = 1000;
 	u32 reg;
 
+	if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC)
+		ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
+
+	if (read)
+		ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
+
 	while (count--) {
+		ndelay(ns);
 		reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0));
 		if (!(reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_BUSY))
 			return 0;
@@ -44,7 +56,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct ulpi_ops *ops, u8 addr)
 	reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr);
 	dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg);
 
-	ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc);
+	ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -62,7 +74,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct ulpi_ops *ops, u8 addr, u8 val)
 	reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val;
 	dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg);
 
-	return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc);
+	return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false);
 }
 
 static struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = {
-- 
2.30.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-13  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11  8:36 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2021-02-13  0:04 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2021-02-15 14:29   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YCcXikcgdTJxbelw@debian \
    --to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.