From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:23:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDDjHgrUpEyZbw+j@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210218052333.16109-1-shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 01:23:33PM +0800, Lee Shawn C wrote:
> According to Bspec #20124, max link rate table for DP was updated
> at BDB version 230. Max link rate can support upto UHBR.
>
> After migrate to BDB v230, the definition for LBR, HBR2 and HBR3
> were changed. For backward compatibility. If BDB version was
> from 216 to 229. Driver have to follow original rule to configure
> DP max link rate value from VBT.
>
> v2: split the mapping table to two for old and new BDB definition.
> v3: return link rate instead of assigning it.
> v4: remove the useless variable.
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
> Cc: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
> ---
<snip>
> @@ -445,8 +456,8 @@ struct child_device_config {
> u16 dp_gpio_pin_num; /* 195 */
> u8 dp_iboost_level:4; /* 196 */
> u8 hdmi_iboost_level:4; /* 196 */
> - u8 dp_max_link_rate:2; /* 216 CNL+ */
> - u8 dp_max_link_rate_reserved:6; /* 216 */
> + u8 dp_max_link_rate:3; /* 230 CNL+ */
> + u8 dp_max_link_rate_reserved:5; /* 230 */
I tweaked the comments here to say "216/230" to retain some hint
that version 216 already added some of this.
And now pushed. Thanks.
> } __packed;
>
> struct bdb_general_definitions {
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-20 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 15:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table Lee Shawn C
2021-02-01 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-02-01 23:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-05 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-08 13:31 ` Lee, Shawn C
2021-02-10 16:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-11 5:22 ` Lee, Shawn C
2021-02-12 16:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-17 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Lee Shawn C
2021-02-17 13:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-17 15:38 ` Lee, Shawn C
2021-02-17 8:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table (rev2) Patchwork
2021-02-17 9:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-17 15:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table Lee Shawn C
2021-02-17 15:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-18 12:01 ` Lee, Shawn C
2021-02-17 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table (rev3) Patchwork
2021-02-17 16:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-17 18:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-02-18 5:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4] drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table Lee Shawn C
2021-02-20 10:23 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-02-18 6:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table (rev4) Patchwork
2021-02-18 7:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-18 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-18 11:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/vbt: update DP max link rate table (rev6) Patchwork
2021-02-18 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-18 13:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDDjHgrUpEyZbw+j@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cooper.chiou@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shawn.c.lee@intel.com \
--cc=william.tseng@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.