From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Ian Jackson <iwj@xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][4.15] x86: mirror compat argument translation area for 32-bit PV
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:13:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDO8CM0prPjoo/X1@Air-de-Roger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDOW+ftkNsG2RH3C@Air-de-Roger>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:35:21PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:27:07AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Now that we guard the entire Xen VA space against speculative abuse
> > through hypervisor accesses to guest memory, the argument translation
> > area's VA also needs to live outside this range, at least for 32-bit PV
> > guests. To avoid extra is_hvm_*() conditionals, use the alternative VA
> > uniformly.
>
> Since you are double mapping the per-domain virtual area, won't it
> make more sense to map it just once outside of the Xen virtual space
> area? (so it's always using PML4_ADDR(511))
Right, that's not possible for PV 64bit domains because it's guest
owned linear address space in that case.
It seems like paravirt_ctxt_switch_to will modify the root_pgt to set
the PERDOMAIN_VIRT_START entry, does the same need to be done for
PERDOMAIN2_VIRT_START?
I would also consider giving the slot a more meaningful name, as
PERDOMAIN2_VIRT_START makes it seem like a new per-domain scratch
space, when it's just a different mapping of the existing physical
memory.
Maybe PERDOMAIN_MIRROR_VIRT_START? Or PERDOMAIN_XLAT_VIRT_START?
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-22 10:27 [PATCH][4.15] x86: mirror compat argument translation area for 32-bit PV Jan Beulich
2021-02-22 11:26 ` Ian Jackson
2021-02-22 11:35 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-22 14:12 ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-22 14:13 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2021-02-22 14:20 ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-22 14:46 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-22 14:14 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-02-22 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-22 16:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2021-02-22 19:36 ` Roger Pau Monné
2021-02-23 7:13 ` Jan Beulich
2021-02-24 19:04 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDO8CM0prPjoo/X1@Air-de-Roger \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.