All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: songmuchun@bytedance.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	david@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
	osalvador@suse.de, shy828301@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:22:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDgG/n57mAWsUT+Z@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161278207013991@kroah.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 368 bytes --]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 12:01:10PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Here is the backport.

--
Regards
Sudip

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-mm-hugetlb-fix-a-race-between-freeing-and-dissolving.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 4673 bytes --]

From c4bff68da0c6312208254f1e7591ab587da260a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 18:32:06 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the
 page

commit 7ffddd499ba6122b1a07828f023d1d67629aa017 upstream

There is a race condition between __free_huge_page()
and dissolve_free_huge_page().

  CPU0:                         CPU1:

  // page_count(page) == 1
  put_page(page)
    __free_huge_page(page)
                                dissolve_free_huge_page(page)
                                  spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock)
                                  // PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)
                                  update_and_free_page(page)
                                  // page is freed to the buddy
                                  spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock)
      spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock)
      clear_page_huge_active(page)
      enqueue_huge_page(page)
      // It is wrong, the page is already freed
      spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock)

The race window is between put_page() and dissolve_free_huge_page().

We should make sure that the page is already on the free list when it is
dissolved.

As a result __free_huge_page would corrupt page(s) already in the buddy
allocator.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com
Fixes: c8721bbbdd36 ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage")
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[sudip: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 5f0d0f92adbf..b25a813e0ec2 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -69,6 +69,21 @@ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hugetlb_lock);
 static int num_fault_mutexes;
 struct mutex *hugetlb_fault_mutex_table ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
+static inline bool PageHugeFreed(struct page *head)
+{
+	return page_private(head + 4) == -1UL;
+}
+
+static inline void SetPageHugeFreed(struct page *head)
+{
+	set_page_private(head + 4, -1UL);
+}
+
+static inline void ClearPageHugeFreed(struct page *head)
+{
+	set_page_private(head + 4, 0);
+}
+
 /* Forward declaration */
 static int hugetlb_acct_memory(struct hstate *h, long delta);
 
@@ -866,6 +881,7 @@ static void enqueue_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
 	list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_freelists[nid]);
 	h->free_huge_pages++;
 	h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
+	SetPageHugeFreed(page);
 }
 
 static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_node_exact(struct hstate *h, int nid)
@@ -883,6 +899,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_node_exact(struct hstate *h, int nid)
 		return NULL;
 	list_move(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
 	set_page_refcounted(page);
+	ClearPageHugeFreed(page);
 	h->free_huge_pages--;
 	h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
 	return page;
@@ -1315,6 +1332,7 @@ static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid)
 	set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, NULL);
 	h->nr_huge_pages++;
 	h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
+	ClearPageHugeFreed(page);
 	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
 	put_page(page); /* free it into the hugepage allocator */
 }
@@ -1478,6 +1496,7 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
 
+retry:
 	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
 	if (PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)) {
 		struct page *head = compound_head(page);
@@ -1487,6 +1506,26 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
 			rc = -EBUSY;
 			goto out;
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * We should make sure that the page is already on the free list
+		 * when it is dissolved.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(!PageHugeFreed(head))) {
+			spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
+			cond_resched();
+
+			/*
+			 * Theoretically, we should return -EBUSY when we
+			 * encounter this race. In fact, we have a chance
+			 * to successfully dissolve the page if we do a
+			 * retry. Because the race window is quite small.
+			 * If we seize this opportunity, it is an optimization
+			 * for increasing the success rate of dissolving page.
+			 */
+			goto retry;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Move PageHWPoison flag from head page to the raw error page,
 		 * which makes any subpages rather than the error page reusable.
-- 
2.30.0


      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 11:01 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree gregkh
2021-02-25 20:22 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YDgG/n57mAWsUT+Z@debian \
    --to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.