From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C51C433E0 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F6564F62 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230077AbhCLNYn (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:24:43 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48312 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230386AbhCLNYa (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:24:30 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24AA064F70; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:24:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1615555469; bh=yvU9KDho164al6otHnf3conqpIffpoexT9RlbHCE+RU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QykQnQY7opBGIjoiilEVewzNuZCHzSS82QNb8i4TxouFM9cq3jQxuSfZwzBKwguWZ O3OXIHUsygDUvZGZZYXd5ImJ7VDMz2PDAhC1sgcyepe3kumuElw0L+XGgDOp7rJeJv uPzBCXONWvfT3TTuRP1Mgy4ZaYVgcCiREf3o9PR8= Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:24:27 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: Add ACPI_GPIO_QUIRK_ABSOLUTE_NUMBER quirk" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree Message-ID: References: <16154863759340@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:33:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:24:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:10:09PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:59:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:12:55PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. > > > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > > > > id to . > > > > > > > > No need for v5.4. > > > > > > > > Please, also drop > > > > gpio-pca953x-set-irq-type-when-handle-intel-galileo-gen-2.patch > > > > gpiolib-acpi-allow-to-find-gpioint-resource-by-name-and-index.patch > > > > > > > > from 5.4-stable queue, thanks! > > > > > > Why? If you look at the first commit above, it says: > > > Fixes: ba8c90c61847 ("gpio: pca953x: Override IRQ for one of the expanders on Galileo Gen 2") > > > > > > which is in the 5.4.52 kernel release. So why shouldn't it go there? > > > > > > Same goes for the > > > gpiolib-acpi-allow-to-find-gpioint-resource-by-name-and-index.patch > > > patch. > > > > > > Is your marking of the "Fixes:" tags incorrect somehow? > > > > > > confused, > > > > It has also Depends-on which points out that the regression only visible when > > that commit is in the tree. > > > > If you want to see them in v5.4, I can backport the series. > > Since the other two in your queue, you may try to use this one, which I have > sent for v5.10.y, but it seems good enough for v5.4. > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20210312121542.67389-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/T/#u Ok, this looks to not make sense for 5.4.y, so I've dropped all of the gpiolib patches from there, and fixed up the 5.10.y ones, so we should be all good now. thanks, greg k-h