From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out tdp_iter_return_to_root
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:35:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEuYTF3mzzMCkz5c@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311231658.1243953-5-bgardon@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021, Ben Gardon wrote:
> In tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched there is a call to tdp_iter_start which
> causes the iterator to continue its walk over the paging structure from
> the root. This is needed after a yield as paging structure could have
> been freed in the interim.
>
> The tdp_iter_start call is not very clear and something of a hack. It
> requires exposing tdp_iter fields not used elsewhere in tdp_mmu.c and
> the effect is not obvious from the function name. Factor a more aptly
> named function out of tdp_iter_start and call it from
> tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched and tdp_iter_start.
What about calling it tdp_iter_restart()? Or tdp_iter_resume()? Or something
like tdp_iter_restart_at_next() if we want it to give a hint that the next_last
thing is where it restarts.
I think I like tdp_iter_restart() the best. It'd be easy enough to add a
function comment clarifying from where it restarts, and IMO the resulting code
in tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() is the most intutive, e.g. it makes it very clear
that the walk is being restarted in some capacity after yielding.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-12 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 23:16 [PATCH 0/4] Fix RCU warnings in TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-11 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix RCU usage in handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page Ben Gardon
2021-03-12 15:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-12 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-15 17:08 ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-11 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix RCU usage for tdp_iter_root_pt Ben Gardon
2021-03-12 16:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-15 17:13 ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-11 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix RCU usage when atomically zapping SPTEs Ben Gardon
2021-03-12 16:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-03-11 23:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out tdp_iter_return_to_root Ben Gardon
2021-03-12 16:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-03-12 17:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-12 17:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fix RCU warnings in TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YEuYTF3mzzMCkz5c@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.