From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] media: v4l UAPI docs: document ROI selection targets
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:31:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFFb2ePwiW+8ti4D@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPybu_19hztQQEi0H40sWZQMb-X7g7dDuW4Mz8_gRv-nG2tghw@mail.gmail.com>
On (21/03/16 19:19), Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> > +Configuration of Region of Interest (ROI)
> > +=========================================
> > +
> > +The range of coordinates of the top left corner, width and height of
> > +areas that can be ROI is given by the ``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_BOUNDS`` target.
> > +It is recommended for the driver developers to put the top/left corner
> > +at position ``(0,0)``. The rectangle's coordinates are in global sensor
> > +coordinates. The units are in pixels and independent of the field of view.
> > +They are not impacted by any cropping or scaling that is currently being
> > +used.
>
> Can we also mention binning here?
What's binning? Is it in the UVC spec?
> > +The top left corner, width and height of the Region of Interest area
> > +currently being employed by the device is given by the
> > +``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_CURRENT`` target. It uses the same coordinate system
> > +as ``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_BOUNDS``.
>
> Why do we need current? Cant we just read back V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI ?
We don't. Will remove it.
> > + * - ``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_CURRENT``
> > + - 0x0200
> > + - Current Region of Interest rectangle.
> > + - Yes
> > + - No
> > + * - ``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_DEFAULT``
> > + - 0x0201
> > + - Suggested Region of Interest rectangle.
> > + - Yes
> > + - No
> > + * - ``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_BOUNDS``
> > + - 0x0202
> > + - Bounds of the Region of Interest rectangle. All valid ROI rectangles fit
> > + inside the ROI bounds rectangle.
> > + - Yes
> > + - No
> > + * - ``V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI``
> > + - 0x0203
> > + - Sets the new Region of Interest rectangle.
> > + - Yes
> > + - No
> As mentioned before I think we should not have TGT_ROI_CURRENT and TGT_ROI
Agreed.
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h
> > index 7d21c1634b4d..d0c108fba638 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h
> > @@ -78,6 +78,14 @@
> > #define V4L2_SEL_TGT_COMPOSE_BOUNDS 0x0102
> > /* Current composing area plus all padding pixels */
> > #define V4L2_SEL_TGT_COMPOSE_PADDED 0x0103
> > +/* Current Region of Interest area */
> > +#define V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_CURRENT 0x0200
> > +/* Default Region of Interest area */
> > +#define V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_DEFAULT 0x0201
> > +/* Region of Interest bounds */
> > +#define V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI_BOUNDS 0x0202
> > +/* Set Region of Interest area */
> > +#define V4L2_SEL_TGT_ROI 0x0203
>
> Nit: Maybe it could be a good idea to split doc and code. This way the
> backports/fixes are easier.
I'm quite sure this is the first time I'm being asked to split code
and documentation :) I'm usually asked to do the opposite - merge code
and documentation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 5:17 [PATCHv2 0/3] Add UVC 1.5 Region Of Interest control to uvcvideo Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-08 5:17 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] media: v4l UAPI docs: document ROI selection targets Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-16 18:19 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2021-03-17 1:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-03-17 8:04 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2021-03-17 8:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-08 5:17 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] media: uvcvideo: add ROI auto controls Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-16 18:29 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2021-03-17 1:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-17 8:08 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2021-03-17 8:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-17 9:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-17 9:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-08 5:17 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] media: uvcvideo: add UVC 1.5 ROI control Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-16 18:46 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2021-03-17 1:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-17 7:58 ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2021-03-18 4:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-18 21:19 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-18 21:20 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-19 5:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19 16:40 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-16 5:25 ` [PATCHv2 0/3] Add UVC 1.5 Region Of Interest control to uvcvideo Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFFb2ePwiW+8ti4D@google.com \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.