From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cifsd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, smfrench@gmail.com,
hyc.lee@gmail.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de,
hch@infradead.org, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com,
aurelien.aptel@gmail.com, aaptel@suse.com, sandeen@sandeen.net,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com, colin.king@canonical.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] cifsd: add file operations
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:05:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFkw3yabfNCXuO05@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322170916.GS1719932@casper.infradead.org>
On (21/03/22 17:09), Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:03:21PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (21/03/22 08:15), Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > What's the scenario for which your allocator performs better than slub
> > >
> >
> > IIRC request and reply buffers can be up to 4M in size. So this stuff
> > just allocates a number of fat buffers and keeps them around so that
> > it doesn't have to vmalloc(4M) for every request and every response.
>
> Hang on a minute, this speaks to a deeper design problem. If we're doing
> a 'request' or 'reply' that is that large, the I/O should be coming from
> or going to the page cache. If it goes via a 4MB virtually contiguous
> buffer first, that's a memcpy that could/should be avoided.
But huge vmalloc buffers are still needed. For instance, `ls -la` in
a directory with a huge number of entries.
> But now i'm looking for how ksmbd_find_buffer() is used, and it isn't.
> So it looks like someone came to the same conclusion I did, but forgot
> to delete the wm code.
Yes, I think it's disabled by default and requires some smb.conf
configuration. So I guess that wm code can be removed. Especially given
that
> That said, there are plenty of opportunities to optimise the vmalloc code,
> and that's worth pursuing.
That would be really interesting to see!
> And here's the receive path which contains
> the memcpy that should be avoided (ok, it's actually the call to ->read;
> we shouldn't be reading in the entire 4MB but rather the header):
> + conn->request_buf = ksmbd_alloc_request(size);
> + if (!conn->request_buf)
> + continue;
> +
> + memcpy(conn->request_buf, hdr_buf, sizeof(hdr_buf));
> + if (!ksmbd_smb_request(conn))
> + break;
> +
> + /*
> + * We already read 4 bytes to find out PDU size, now
> + * read in PDU
> + */
> + size = t->ops->read(t, conn->request_buf + 4, pdu_size);
// A side note, it seems that the maximum read/write/trans buffer size that
// windows supports is 8MB, not 4MB.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20210322052203epcas1p21fe2d04c4df5396c466c38f4d57d8bb8@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-03-22 5:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] cifsd: introduce new SMB3 kernel server Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] cifsd: add server handler and tranport layers Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 22:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-23 3:01 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-03-23 3:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-23 3:16 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 5:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3 Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 6:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-22 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-22 13:25 ` [Linux-cifsd-devel] " Stefan Metzmacher
2021-03-22 23:20 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 23:17 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-03-23 7:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-25 5:25 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2021-03-22 8:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-22 10:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-22 13:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-22 5:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] cifsd: add file operations Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 6:55 ` Al Viro
2021-03-23 0:12 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 7:02 ` Al Viro
2021-03-22 9:26 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-22 7:04 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-22 9:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-22 8:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-22 9:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-22 13:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-22 13:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-22 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-22 17:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-23 0:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-03-22 16:16 ` Schaufler, Casey
2021-03-23 0:21 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 5:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] cifsd: add Kconfig and Makefile Namjae Jeon
2021-03-22 5:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add cifsd kernel server Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YFkw3yabfNCXuO05@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=aaptel@suse.com \
--cc=aurelien.aptel@gmail.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifsd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.