Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] perf-stat: introduce config stat.bpf-counter-events

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 04:39:33PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Apr 8, 2021, at 4:47 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:36:01PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> >> Currently, to use BPF to aggregate perf event counters, the user uses
> >> --bpf-counters option. Enable "use bpf by default" events with a config
> >> option, stat.bpf-counter-events. This is limited to hardware events in
> >> evsel__hw_names.
> >> 
> >> This also enables mixed BPF event and regular event in the same sesssion.
> >> For example:
> >> 
> >>   perf config stat.bpf-counter-events=instructions
> >>   perf stat -e instructions,cs
> >> 
> > 
> > so if we are mixing events now, how about uing modifier for bpf counters,
> > instead of configuring .perfconfig list we could use:
> > 
> >  perf stat -e instructions:b,cs
> > 
> > thoughts?
> > 
> > the change below adds 'b' modifier and sets 'evsel::bpf_counter',
> > feel free to use it
> 
> I think we will need both 'b' modifier and .perfconfig configuration. 
> For systems with BPF-managed perf events running in the background, 

hum, I'm not sure I understand what that means.. you mean there
are tools that run perf stat so you don't want to change them?

> .perfconfig makes sure perf-stat sessions will share PMCs with these 
> background monitoring tools. 'b' modifier, on the other hand, is useful
> when the user knows there is opportunity to share the PMCs. 
> 
> Does this make sense? 

if there's reason for that then sure.. but let's not limit that just
on HARDWARE events only.. there are RAW events with the same demand
for this feature.. why don't we let user define any event for this?

jirka