Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:29:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/bpf.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   861de02e5f3f ("bpf: Take module reference for trampoline in module")
> 
> from the bpf tree and commit:
> 
>   69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc include/linux/bpf.h
> index fdac0534ce79,39dce9d3c3a5..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@@ -40,7 -40,7 +40,8 @@@ struct bpf_local_storage
>   struct bpf_local_storage_map;
>   struct kobject;
>   struct mem_cgroup;
>  +struct module;
> + struct bpf_func_state;
>   
>   extern struct idr btf_idr;
>   extern spinlock_t btf_idr_lock;

ack, thanks
jirka