From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: attr fork related fstests failures on for-next
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:16:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGIZZLoiyULTaUev@bfoster> (raw)
Hi,
I'm seeing a couple different fstests failures on current for-next that
appear to be associated with e6a688c33238 ("xfs: initialise attr fork on
inode create"). The first is xfs_check complaining about sb versionnum
bits on various tests:
generic/003 16s ... _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (c)
(see /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/003.full for details)
# cat results/generic/003.full
...
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (c)
*** xfs_check output ***
sb versionnum missing attr bit 10
*** end xfs_check output
...
#
With xfs_check bypassed, repair eventually complains about some attr
forks. The first point I hit this variant is generic/117:
generic/117 9s ... _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (r)
(see /root/xfstests-dev/results//generic/117.full for details)
# cat results//generic/117.full
...
_check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/test-scratch is inconsistent (r)
*** xfs_repair -n output ***
...
Phase 3 - for each AG...
- scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
- process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
- agno = 0
bad attr fork offset 24 in dev inode 135, should be 1
would have cleared inode 135
bad attr fork offset 24 in dev inode 142, should be 1
would have cleared inode 142
...
Both problems disappear with e6a688c33238 reverted.
Brian
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-29 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-29 18:16 Brian Foster [this message]
2021-03-29 18:31 ` attr fork related fstests failures on for-next Darrick J. Wong
2021-03-29 20:48 ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-29 21:06 ` Dave Chinner
2021-03-29 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YGIZZLoiyULTaUev@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.