From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] migration: warn about non-migratable configurations unless '--no-migration' was specified
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:37:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH2xzIlCfjwdVF2R@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOpTY_oCNcPjB6aHn6kp6Pb=TJSYKLuTOWyLD+1LP24w3F_c=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:28:04PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:54 AM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 16:46, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > When a migration blocker is added nothing is reported to the user,
> > > inability to migrate such guest may come as a late surprise. As a bare
> > > minimum, we can print a warning. To not pollute the output for those, who
> > > have no intention to migrate their guests, introduce '--no-migration'
> > > option which both block the migration and eliminates warning from
> >
> > I'm not a fan. For a lot of people and configurations this
> > is going to be "add an extra complaint from QEMU to a previously
> > working configuration". We add too many of those already.
>
> I agree that warning with machine types that never supported live
> migration would be useless noise, but warning if using an explicit
> versioned machine type sounds like a reasonable default (as long as
> the warnings includes clear instructions on how to silence them).
Libvirt will always expand a machine type alias into a versioned
machine type, because stable ABI is useful even if never migrating,
because it ensures the guest OS doesn't see hardware changes that
may trigger license re-activation
At the same time a large portion of users will never care about
live migration/save/restore, or they do care but will hotunplug
the problems devices before attempting a migration.
IMHO tieing messages to versioned machine types is not desirable
as a strategy by default.
Warning about migration compatibility should be an explicit opt-in
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 15:44 [PATCH RFC] migration: warn about non-migratable configurations unless '--no-migration' was specified Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-04-15 16:04 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-15 16:30 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-15 16:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-15 17:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-15 17:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-16 7:33 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-04-16 16:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-17 9:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-19 16:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-19 16:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-19 17:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-19 17:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-19 17:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-19 18:47 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-19 19:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-20 11:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-20 13:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-20 14:10 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-04-20 14:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-20 15:20 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-17 9:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-19 7:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-19 15:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-18 15:53 ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-19 16:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-19 16:37 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YH2xzIlCfjwdVF2R@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.