All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:38:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHbGOWnVbMjFV7TI@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a6145a5-e6ac-3d33-b52a-0823bfc3b864@huawei.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:10:39AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> Hi Ming,
> 
> > 
> > It is reported inside RH that CPU utilization is increased ~20% when
> > running simple FIO test inside VM which disk is built on image stored
> > on XFS/megaraid_sas.
> > 
> > When I try to investigate by reproducing the issue via scsi_debug, I found
> > IO hang when running randread IO(8k, direct IO, libaio) on scsi_debug disk
> > created by the following command:
> > 
> > 	modprobe scsi_debug host_max_queue=128 submit_queues=$NR_CPUS virtual_gb=256
> > 
> 
> So I can recreate this hang for using mq-deadline IO sched for scsi debug,
> in that fio does not exit. I'm using v5.12-rc7.
> 
> Do you have any idea of what changed to cause this, as we would have tested
> this before? Or maybe only none IO sched on scsi_debug. And normally 4k
> block size and only rw=read (for me, anyway).

Just run a quick test with none on scsi_debug, looks the issue can't be
reproduced, but very worse performance is observed with none(20% IOPS drops,
and 50% CPU utilization increased).

> 
> Note that host_max_queue=128 will cap submit queue depth at 128, while would
> be 192 by default.

I take 128 because the reported megaraid_sas's host queue depth is 128.


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-14  7:50 [bug report] shared tags causes IO hang and performance drop Ming Lei
2021-04-14 10:10 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 10:38   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-04-14 10:42   ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 11:12     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-14 12:06       ` John Garry
2021-04-15  3:46         ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 10:41           ` John Garry
2021-04-15 12:18             ` Ming Lei
2021-04-15 15:41               ` John Garry
2021-04-16  0:46                 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16  8:29                   ` John Garry
2021-04-16  8:39                     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16 14:59                       ` John Garry
2021-04-20  3:06                         ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20  3:22                           ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-20  4:54                             ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-20  6:52                               ` Ming Lei
2021-04-20 20:22                                 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-21  1:40                                   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-23  8:43           ` John Garry
2021-04-26 10:53             ` John Garry
2021-04-26 14:48               ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 15:52                 ` John Garry
2021-04-26 16:03                   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-26 17:02                     ` John Garry
2021-04-26 23:59                       ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27  7:52                         ` John Garry
2021-04-27  9:11                           ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27  9:37                             ` John Garry
2021-04-27  9:52                               ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 10:15                                 ` John Garry
2021-07-07 17:06                                 ` John Garry
2021-04-14 13:59       ` Kashyap Desai
2021-04-14 17:03         ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-14 18:19           ` John Garry
2021-04-14 19:39             ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-15  0:58         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHbGOWnVbMjFV7TI@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.