From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC4AC433B4 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF556137D for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:06:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0AF556137D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=stwcx.xyz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FLnMn2402z3bv1 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 04:06:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=OO1xmXD9; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=AAEu0r4f; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=stwcx.xyz (client-ip=66.111.4.25; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=patrick@stwcx.xyz; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=stwcx.xyz header.i=@stwcx.xyz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=OO1xmXD9; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=AAEu0r4f; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FLnMG4VXTz304D for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 04:05:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024C25C00ED; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:05:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:05:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stwcx.xyz; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm1; bh=SpBA78f035lwPqdwqFqnAuKN8Ac 7uBDrVpp7De1WzpU=; b=OO1xmXD9cmkt29BVgvGun0/YUEH/Efkezg2+GQEaVSF bZ3IWuBEy0B9/fVM+K3LPKv4JxUWsUcLaKt42Owu3c4vPV1b3exS0/w/zcVfvMov QmmHBJw7iE91rqha+8uEXv+UuoZ3dZYxhgX+J9r/eiV8sTy4GngwlgYxGrNXmeTg DeRuJLDA9+Zr7g8aovsqyMr+nvBrWIjCAcc6qMIj944i19CwTP/chtDRY+APjnem r36xvx0k6e9YRGHYjx6SkF3rwXGBhYt/e8e4VJu6sXUd/h0eKS4E8E205DOE211d X8wKti6Gcud0VONsqQpXV5I6voy+Y5HMDZyP/pViwwg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=SpBA78 f035lwPqdwqFqnAuKN8Ac7uBDrVpp7De1WzpU=; b=AAEu0r4fb9vutxIDIGKWVT e2w00x4QVa/JMsOzlsEJh3FPqsOmkogmkve7P0YfNv146oZcsNDBSaPh/Op4vZbj E02jhYb1ze29IwqptbJmp8trtznVyrqH5qRbZbSLeFgDY/nSrp4oEN5Qp2A4CbkW xGn0Le3oswYy4TJEywJh9uCvFM8tggq+7mTMAjEwdEXbkn9EiYnd8CJ5Ky9hX2iu FGBE5x9ScgC8tabWh1jZWAxXEwJmM1M7JBsvCH+veiyNMGsTXqz0X9XyE2lH8ZEk cqo05q9NuHbkFfe1p6q9JC6tOsV9VeGRNq8KWqrAIoJKJotLKwuYEKvwU5cG1bzQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelfedguddvhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enfghrlhcuvffnffculdejtddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredt tddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehprghtrhhitghkse hsthiftgigrdighiiiqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegheehfeffgeekveehtdfhgfdu hfegfefgtdehhfektdelffevkefgueffhedtieenucfkphepjeeirddvhedtrdekgedrvd efieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehp rghtrhhitghksehsthiftgigrdighiii X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (76-250-84-236.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [76.250.84.236]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F170B240057; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:05:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:05:36 -0500 From: Patrick Williams To: Vernon Mauery Subject: Re: Time for C++20. Message-ID: References: <69ba3eb8-fab3-c0a3-2530-67ebe0de4526@linux.intel.com> <20210414231056.GA22459@mauery.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jluMTulcHv6UXAo2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210414231056.GA22459@mauery.jf.intel.com> X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Bills, Jason M" , openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" --jluMTulcHv6UXAo2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:13:13PM -0700, Vernon Mauery wrote: > On 14-Apr-2021 02:12 PM, Bills, Jason M wrote: > >coroutines are also an interesting possibility for some of our async cal= ls. >=20 > The c++ coroutines are implemented differently than the boost::asio=20 > stuff that ipmid is currently using. It will require some rewriting. But= =20 > I would prefer to move on to the standard than using an older=20 > implementation from boost. Agreed. I'm wanting to free up some time to work on enhancing sdbusplus with co-routines support. --=20 Patrick Williams --jluMTulcHv6UXAo2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEBGD9ii4LE9cNbqJBqwNHzC0AwRkFAmB4gG4ACgkQqwNHzC0A wRlpNA//f2mmUzkSZ+qjvjg+VaUqMhOkqdgSZ5OqimEqlwcF8j8Ndr3yBxcfbbvj cpTP89875u8RiKsylIMrCJklVD8Y7y0W0bNGa49XGVvp73XWT0u7n9uwulujFOoe +FHiZY9BCf8Kufz+7jDtyIxZM3jT4iT4t5zdQqNjwPYuJ89EQfPPqqaJ2bTkGk2q AWx16z7bwWFHnYc/x13asoeIYIOr61nYmcINoSJBjUdQBOD2pholcQzczcAZ9sln W15wmD+Yo3xc2C1WxKiol3vKUGEsYGLVV+WQah0a7UJM3fOhkFGhFBocOS6A9ih7 hbBKQbtrxdmvNfHXuZbxuXFUaJIcIgQObN+cq8oXEYeiVULXQSCsu09FfmjhSrNX hFAY+QPQ2kvDTXqkIOajBVvGvY/+kD4kTLMDnyRPkFVTyeGYCIt7eNrKhRovxpR3 6/WM5q2PsI5kZlNgqBKS5jKH65X6nZ2DoO0wJD/Wjh1ItK1SO7exjgZ3jOYa+DmR 6/QiswWf+WfWQBfvCWcAH+NMBNZ92R1DINpNa9+PkzezlU+zGb1QkQZn6t6WsvDB UXWAYFWlVtSaUOJAMlkPQfToA2tANlu5VwuyFyzLiM0EXWDswZ7haKS6DLQeJyrW 2U0fzt/UCPspFyw0x8IyvoUpCTO08srXbFdL8OiXdeVrEbnv/ug= =o/lH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jluMTulcHv6UXAo2--