From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:24:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIl+K0p0jzE/ilo0@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428143013.GA31155@redhat>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:30:13AM -0400, David Jeffery wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:10:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> > refcount_inc_not_zero() in bt_tags_iter() still may read one freed
> > request.
> >
> > Fix the issue by the following approach:
> >
> > 1) hold a per-tags spinlock when reading ->rqs[tag] and calling
> > refcount_inc_not_zero in bt_tags_iter()
> >
>
> This method of closing the race still in my original patch is very nice.
> It's a great improvement.
>
> > 2) clearing stale request referred via ->rqs[tag] before freeing
> > request pool, the per-tags spinlock is held for clearing stale
> > ->rq[tag]
> >
> > So after we cleared stale requests, bt_tags_iter() won't observe
> > freed request any more, also the clearing will wait for pending
> > request reference.
> >
> > The idea of clearing ->rqs[] is borrowed from John Garry's previous
> > patch and one recent David's patch.
> >
>
> However, when you took my original cmpxchg patch and merged my separate
> function to do the cmpxchg cleaning into blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping, you
> missed why it was a separate function. Your patch will clean out the
> static_rqs requests which are being freed, but it doesn't clean out the
> special flush request that gets allocated individually by a
> request_queue. The flush request can be put directly into the rqs[]
> array so it also needs to be cleaned when a request_queue is being
> torn down. This was the second caller of my separated cleaning function.
It can be covered just in one calling of the cleaning function,
see the following patch:
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index e1e997af89a0..fb9eeb03d6a0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -500,7 +500,8 @@ static void blk_mq_sched_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
unsigned int flags = set->flags & ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED;
if (hctx->sched_tags) {
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, hctx->sched_tags, hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, hctx->sched_tags, hctx_idx,
+ hctx->fq->flush_rq);
blk_mq_free_rq_map(hctx->sched_tags, flags);
hctx->sched_tags = NULL;
}
@@ -611,7 +612,8 @@ void blk_mq_sched_free_requests(struct request_queue *q)
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
if (hctx->sched_tags)
- blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i,
+ hctx->fq->flush_rq);
}
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 9329b94a9743..757e0e652ce7 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -277,9 +277,15 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
if (iter_static_rqs)
rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
else {
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
- if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
+ if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
return true;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
}
if ((iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED) &&
!blk_mq_request_started(rq))
@@ -526,6 +532,7 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int total_tags,
tags->nr_tags = total_tags;
tags->nr_reserved_tags = reserved_tags;
+ spin_lock_init(&tags->lock);
if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
return tags;
@@ -586,7 +593,8 @@ int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
return -ENOMEM;
}
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, *tagsptr, hctx->queue_num);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, *tagsptr, hctx->queue_num,
+ hctx->fq->flush_rq);
blk_mq_free_rq_map(*tagsptr, flags);
*tagsptr = new;
} else {
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
index 7d3e6b333a4a..f942a601b5ef 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct blk_mq_tags {
struct request **rqs;
struct request **static_rqs;
struct list_head page_list;
+
+ /* used to clear rqs[] before one request pool is freed */
+ spinlock_t lock;
};
extern struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int nr_tags,
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 4bd6c11bd8bc..686f6b210114 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2291,8 +2291,42 @@ blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
}
+static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
+{
+ return (size_t)PAGE_SIZE << order;
+}
+
+/* called before freeing request pool in @tags */
+static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
+ struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int hctx_idx,
+ struct request *flush_rq)
+{
+ struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &tags->page_list, lru) {
+ unsigned long start = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
+ unsigned long end = start + order_to_size(page->private);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < set->queue_depth; i++) {
+ struct request *rq = drv_tags->rqs[i];
+ unsigned long rq_addr = (unsigned long)rq;
+
+ if ((rq_addr >= start && rq_addr < end) ||
+ rq == flush_rq) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&rq->ref) != 0);
+ cmpxchg(&drv_tags->rqs[i], rq, NULL);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
+}
+
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
- unsigned int hctx_idx)
+ unsigned int hctx_idx, struct request *flush_rq)
{
struct page *page;
@@ -2309,6 +2343,8 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
}
}
+ blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx, flush_rq);
+
while (!list_empty(&tags->page_list)) {
page = list_first_entry(&tags->page_list, struct page, lru);
list_del_init(&page->lru);
@@ -2368,11 +2404,6 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
return tags;
}
-static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
-{
- return (size_t)PAGE_SIZE << order;
-}
-
static int blk_mq_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
unsigned int hctx_idx, int node)
{
@@ -2461,7 +2492,7 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
return 0;
fail:
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, tags, hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, tags, hctx_idx, NULL);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -2794,7 +2825,7 @@ static void blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
unsigned int flags = set->flags;
if (set->tags && set->tags[hctx_idx]) {
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx, NULL);
blk_mq_free_rq_map(set->tags[hctx_idx], flags);
set->tags[hctx_idx] = NULL;
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index 143afe42c63a..08ef96c181f6 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void blk_mq_put_rq_ref(struct request *rq);
* Internal helpers for allocating/freeing the request map
*/
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
- unsigned int hctx_idx);
+ unsigned int hctx_idx, struct request *flush_rq);
void blk_mq_free_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int flags);
struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
unsigned int hctx_idx,
--
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 15:10 [PATCH V3 0/3] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] block: avoid double io accounting for flush request Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-27 20:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-28 0:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-28 1:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-28 2:22 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-04-28 14:30 ` David Jeffery
2021-04-28 15:24 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIl+K0p0jzE/ilo0@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.