From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA8AC433ED for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69C376141B for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:21:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 69C376141B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=shelob.surriel.com) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lbjBa-0002fy-93; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:20:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lbjBY-0002fZ-2O for kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:20:56 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 794C461418; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:20:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1619612454; bh=46NOAPukfKiOsVS2b8yCpV5HcgSzuZTzoL1lJfcFngc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mJKwLeFOFCD1Vw3ws46O8gaXMgFTodXh5NX+F6pwKv7PTlM7V8smIihxGv7wYpwzi n8CiftQxXObFAJDepRwqh0S+DEgYZuTGHtTttol1QNPVzahOElHwL0Nu6qVSjN2KoY vATkOXChhXb0PSa1ZXiaxc7oJTizb7IAtNWNeQqmKH4AZcMgCen4iH9Vf8gK8COIgy 5RIDB7Zz2Nj2wDxPXdUAE+Pvr2sTZ4EaclMXYP/H75JWtCnKcC136TNunVfzNL8dhG RIn3F/0+GgzlbDpbMd49FFyFHnhB7yFyf4X1tBtvjG+e4rXWHKhE3XgQ1eZC45caEW 750G0gwAD0NMg== Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:20:47 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Anupama K Patil Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete Message-ID: References: <20210428110536.edy74gsobkgtd6al@ubuntu> <20210428114057.tlc53ie7crvkqqhj@ubuntu> <20210428121329.o4jlx76klmzlzl5n@ubuntu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210428121329.o4jlx76klmzlzl5n@ubuntu> Cc: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org, Greg KH , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , B K Karthik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jaroslav Kysela , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org X-BeenThere: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Learn about the Linux kernel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kernelnewbies-bounces@kernelnewbies.org On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:43:29PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > On 21/04/28 02:48PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:10:57PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > On 21/04/28 01:11PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > > > isapnp code is very old and according to this link > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specifications > > > > > from Wikipedia, even Windows Vista disabled ISA PnP by default. > > > > > > > > > > This change is in follow up to > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu/T/#u > > > > > and https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210424194301.jmsqpycvsm7izbk3@ubuntu/T/#u > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: B K Karthik > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anupama K Patil > > > > > > > > Has the maintainer said this is unsupported? > > > > > > > > That's who you should take suggestions from :) > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Leon said he thinks it is unsupported (I've also cc'd him). So, I've sent this patch > > > to get the feedback from the maintainer. > > > > Leon said something different. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu/T/#m6c837180c8d6496d5bcbb8526e274c4239844be0 > > ------ > > > If changes to ISA code aren't welcomed, should these be marked obsolete in the MAINTIANERS file? > > > > I think so, but think that "Odd Fixes" better describes that Rafael wrote. > > ------ > Sorry about that! but does checkpatch tell people not to send patches if it's 'Odd fixes'? I don't think so, but people should check MAINTIANERS file before they send patches and it has an explanation what "Odd fixes" means. > Should I wait for the maintainer's reply before doing anything else? Yes, please > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Anupama _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3246C433ED for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1A06141B for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234470AbhD1MVj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:21:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50076 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233738AbhD1MVj (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:21:39 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 794C461418; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:20:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1619612454; bh=46NOAPukfKiOsVS2b8yCpV5HcgSzuZTzoL1lJfcFngc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mJKwLeFOFCD1Vw3ws46O8gaXMgFTodXh5NX+F6pwKv7PTlM7V8smIihxGv7wYpwzi n8CiftQxXObFAJDepRwqh0S+DEgYZuTGHtTttol1QNPVzahOElHwL0Nu6qVSjN2KoY vATkOXChhXb0PSa1ZXiaxc7oJTizb7IAtNWNeQqmKH4AZcMgCen4iH9Vf8gK8COIgy 5RIDB7Zz2Nj2wDxPXdUAE+Pvr2sTZ4EaclMXYP/H75JWtCnKcC136TNunVfzNL8dhG RIn3F/0+GgzlbDpbMd49FFyFHnhB7yFyf4X1tBtvjG+e4rXWHKhE3XgQ1eZC45caEW 750G0gwAD0NMg== Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:20:47 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Anupama K Patil Cc: Greg KH , Jaroslav Kysela , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, B K Karthik , kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete Message-ID: References: <20210428110536.edy74gsobkgtd6al@ubuntu> <20210428114057.tlc53ie7crvkqqhj@ubuntu> <20210428121329.o4jlx76klmzlzl5n@ubuntu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210428121329.o4jlx76klmzlzl5n@ubuntu> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:43:29PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > On 21/04/28 02:48PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 05:10:57PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > On 21/04/28 01:11PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote: > > > > > isapnp code is very old and according to this link > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specifications > > > > > from Wikipedia, even Windows Vista disabled ISA PnP by default. > > > > > > > > > > This change is in follow up to > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu/T/#u > > > > > and https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210424194301.jmsqpycvsm7izbk3@ubuntu/T/#u > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: B K Karthik > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anupama K Patil > > > > > > > > Has the maintainer said this is unsupported? > > > > > > > > That's who you should take suggestions from :) > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Leon said he thinks it is unsupported (I've also cc'd him). So, I've sent this patch > > > to get the feedback from the maintainer. > > > > Leon said something different. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu/T/#m6c837180c8d6496d5bcbb8526e274c4239844be0 > > ------ > > > If changes to ISA code aren't welcomed, should these be marked obsolete in the MAINTIANERS file? > > > > I think so, but think that "Odd Fixes" better describes that Rafael wrote. > > ------ > Sorry about that! but does checkpatch tell people not to send patches if it's 'Odd fixes'? I don't think so, but people should check MAINTIANERS file before they send patches and it has an explanation what "Odd fixes" means. > Should I wait for the maintainer's reply before doing anything else? Yes, please > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Anupama