From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:02:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIrKos+40mQnqFMR@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b30e5815-441c-b4d3-85ad-65a4020f6d93@arm.com>
On Thursday 29 Apr 2021 at 14:34:14 (+0200), Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 28/04/2021 19:27, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Util-clamp places tasks in different buckets based on their clamp values
> > for performance reasons. However, the size of buckets is currently
> > computed using a rounding division, which can lead to an off-by-one
> > error in some configurations.
> >
> > For instance, with 20 buckets, the bucket size will be 1024/20=51.2,
> > rounded to the closest value: 51. Now, a task with a clamp of 1024 (as
> > is the default for the min clamp of RT tasks) will be mapped to bucket
> > id 1024/51=20 as we're now using a standard integer division. Sadly,
> > correct indexes are in range [0,19], hence leading to an out of bound
> > memory access.
> >
> > Fix this by using a rounding-up division when computing the bucket size.
>
> But in case you use e.g. 16 buckets, wouldn't you still end up with this
> task mapped into bucket_id=16?
>
> 1024/16=64
>
> 1024/64=16
Hrmpf, you're right ...
So I guess the following will do:
#define UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / UCLAMP_BUCKETS + 1)
Thanks,
Quentin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 17:27 [PATCH] sched: Fix out-of-bound access in uclamp Quentin Perret
2021-04-29 12:34 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-29 15:02 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIrKos+40mQnqFMR@google.com \
--to=qperret@google.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.