From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: drop deprecated scsi=on|off property
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 11:45:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJElvmfnOl5J5Goo@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIu4lDTeg1TZKWZg@angien.pipo.sk>
* Peter Krempa (pkrempa@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 09:42:05 +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 04:52:21PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > >> The scsi=on|off property was deprecated in QEMU 5.0 and can be removed
> > >> completely at this point.
> > >>
> > >> Drop the scsi=on|off option. It was only available on Legacy virtio-blk
> > >> devices. Linux v5.6 already dropped support for it.
> > >>
> > >> Remove the hw_compat_2_4[] property assignment since scsi=on|off no
> > >> longer exists. Old guests with Legacy virtio-blk devices no longer see
> > >> the SCSI host features bit.
> > >>
> > >
> > > This means pc-2.4 will now break guest ABI if using virtio-blk
> > > devices, correct?
> > >
> > > This looks like a sign we should have deprecated pc-2.4 a long
> > > time ago.
> >
> > The last batch of PC machine type retiring was pc-1.0 to pc-1.3:
> > deprecated in 5.0 (commit 30d2a17b4, Dec 2019), dropped in 6.0 (commit
> > f862ddbb1, just weeks ago). pc-1.3 was a bit over seven years old when
> > we released 5.0. pc-2.4 will be six years old by the time we release
> > 6.1. Fair game?
>
> As a data-point, libvirt will be dropping support for <qemu-2.10
> (release, not the machine type) in the upcomming release. I'm not sure
> whether that justifies more deprecation though.
What qemu features will you then be relying on?
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-04 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 15:52 [PATCH] virtio-blk: drop deprecated scsi=on|off property Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-04-29 16:16 ` Peter Krempa
2021-05-04 14:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-04-29 18:03 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-30 7:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-30 7:58 ` Peter Krempa
2021-05-04 10:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2021-05-04 14:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-04 14:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-05-04 15:26 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-30 5:47 ` Michal Prívozník
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJElvmfnOl5J5Goo@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.