All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Đoàn Trần Công Danh" <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Alex Henrie" <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>,
	"Git mailing list" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Rebase options via git pull
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 21:48:34 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKKCQmaEHMR5WATP@danh.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a6otv7lm.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>

On 2021-05-17 15:59:49+0300, Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2021-05-17 15:33:18+0300, Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Probably add generic cmd.<cmd>.opts config support, so that I can say:
>>> >>
>>> >>   git -c cmd.rebase.opts="--no-fork-point --empty=keep" pull --rebase
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > It's been discussed before (but I did not dig up the discussions,
>>> > sorry). It's been considered a bad idea, because our commands are a
>>> > mixture of plumbing/porcelain commands and switches, so we want to be
>>> > able to reliably invoke say ls-tree with some switches internally,
>>> > without config tripping us up.
>>> >
>>> > Of course we could make this sort of thing work by selectively ignoring
>>> > the config, but such a thing would be equal in complexity to the effort
>>> > of assering that it's safe to introduce new rebase.* config in the
>>> > codebase for every switch it has now, but with a less friendly interface
>>> > both for git itself and users.
>>> 
>>> I don't see much complexity here. We'd then just need to effectively
>>> invoke ls-tree internally like this:
>>> 
>>>    git -c 'cmd.ls-tree.opts=' ls-tree
>>> 
>>> Not a big deal.
>>
>> It's a big deal.
>>
>> Scripts was written with plumbing command and expect stable output.
>> If such change can be accepted, a lot of scripts will begin to fail.
> 
> Makes sense. Then simply don't do it for plumbing?

Then, we will get back to the state Ævar pointed out.

Quoted again:

>>> > Of course we could make this sort of thing work by selectively ignoring
>>> > the config, but such a thing would be equal in complexity to the effort
>>> > of assering that it's safe to introduce new rebase.* config in the
>>> > codebase for every switch it has now, but with a less friendly interface
>>> > both for git itself and users.

Anyway, it's not only plumbing command, it's also semi-plumbing
commands (the ones accept --porcelain option) like:

	git status --porcelain[=<version>]

-- 
Danh

      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-17 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-13 13:19 Rebase options via git pull Sergey Organov
2021-05-13 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-14  9:14   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-15  7:39     ` Sergey Organov
2021-05-14  0:49 ` Alex Henrie
2021-05-14  0:58   ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-05-14  1:01     ` Alex Henrie
2021-05-14  6:37     ` Sergey Organov
2021-05-17 10:11       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-05-17 12:33         ` Sergey Organov
2021-05-17 12:42           ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2021-05-17 12:59             ` Sergey Organov
2021-05-17 14:48               ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKKCQmaEHMR5WATP@danh.dev \
    --to=congdanhqx@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sorganov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.