From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@codeaurora.org>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vbabka@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
glittao@gmail.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:33:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKPCNT+yiBfkvnbP@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d91e7cb-514f-8816-76b1-a70f6891a47a@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:24:48PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
>
>
> On 5/7/2021 5:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 03:52:03PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
> >> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
> >> one is PAGE_SIZE limitiation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
> >> to "one value per file" rule.
> >>
> >> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls implemeation
> >> to debugfs.
> >>
> >> Rename the alloc_calls/free_calls to alloc_traces/free_traces,
> >> to be inline with what it does.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@codeaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >> include/linux/slub_def.h | 10 ++
> >> mm/slab_common.c | 9 ++
> >> mm/slub.c | 362 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >> 3 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> >> index dcde82a..f8c268d 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> >> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct kmem_cache {
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> >> struct kobject kobj; /* For sysfs */
> >> #endif
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
> >> + struct dentry *slab_cache_dentry;
> >> +#endif
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED
> >> unsigned long random;
> >> #endif
> >> @@ -159,6 +162,13 @@ static inline void sysfs_slab_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
> >> }
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> >> +void debugfs_slab_release(struct kmem_cache *);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void debugfs_slab_release(struct kmem_cache *s)
> >> +{
> >> +}
> >> +#endif
> >> void object_err(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> >> u8 *object, char *reason);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> >> index f8833d3..f3afe6b 100644
> >> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> >> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> >> @@ -445,6 +445,9 @@ static void slab_caches_to_rcu_destroy_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> >> #else
> >> slab_kmem_cache_release(s);
> >> #endif
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) && defined(CONFIG_SLUB)
> >> + debugfs_slab_release(s);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > If you write your .h files correctly, no need for #ifdef in a .c file.
> >
> > Please fix up.
> >
> fixed in new patch and used the single #ifded because
> debugfs_slab_release declaration is there in slub_def.h and slab_common
> is used for both slab and slub.
> Like SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS, SLAB_SUPPORT_DEBUGFS will be not defined if
> slab config is used.
No, you should have have any #ifdef at all, as I point out in that
review.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 10:22 [PATCH v5] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs Faiyaz Mohammed
2021-05-06 14:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 14:29 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 14:32 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 14:32 ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07 11:48 ` Greg KH
2021-05-18 12:54 ` Faiyaz Mohammed
2021-05-18 13:33 ` Greg KH [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-06 18:40 kernel test robot
2021-05-07 5:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-05-07 5:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-05-18 12:49 ` Faiyaz Mohammed
2021-05-18 12:49 ` Faiyaz Mohammed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKPCNT+yiBfkvnbP@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=faiyazm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=glittao@gmail.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.