Re: [PATCH 0/2] driver core: platform: Remove platform_device_add_properties()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:53:09PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:40 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:48:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:30:57PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:21:46PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:59:22AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:30:44AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It looks like there is only one place left that still uses the
> > > > > > > function. Converting that last user and removing the thing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Note, I'm actually resending the patch for board-paz00.c. I'm assuming
> > > > > > > the original patch slipped through the cracks because it did not end
> > > > > > > up anywhere.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cool!
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Btw, which base have you used for this series?
> > > > >
> > > > > intel-next for this one.
> > > >
> > > > I mean linux-next :-)
> > >
> > > Let's wait for CIs to respond. I have a feeling that the first patch is good
> > > for v5.14, while the second one is probably for the next cycle.
> >
> > Why?  I can take both now, no problem...
> 
> Not really, there are dependencies, one in my tree ATM.
> 
> It's better if I take them IMHO.

Sure, feel free to:

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>